Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Apr;34(4):1024-6.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.1024-1026.1996.

Susceptibility testing of Propionibacterium acnes comparing agar dilution with E test

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Susceptibility testing of Propionibacterium acnes comparing agar dilution with E test

M A Smith et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Propionibacterium acnes has been identified as a significant agent of nosocomial infections, including endophthalmitis. Data concerning susceptibility of P. acnes to newer beta-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolones are limited. Recent reports suggest that quinolones have activity against these organisms sufficient to warrant further study. We undertook a study to select appropriate antimicrobial agents for use in a rabbit model of P. acnes endophthalmitis. We compared the antibiotic susceptibilities of P. acnes by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method of agar dilution with the E test. Thirteen clinical isolates obtained from eye specimens and three American Type Culture Collection control strains were tested against 14 antibiotics. All the clinical isolates were susceptible by both methods to piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefotaxime, cefotetan, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, and imipenem in addition to clindamycin but were resistant to metronidazole. The clinical P. acnes isolates also displayed high-level susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin. Almost all the P. acnes strains demonstrated E-test MICs within 2 dilutions of the MICs observed by the agar dilution method. Those few strains for which discrepancies were noted exhibited E-test susceptibilities three- to fivefold dilutions lower than the agar dilution method susceptibilities but only with ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and/or clindamycin. On the basis of our study, all of clinical eye isolates were susceptible to these newer antimicrobial agents and the two methods demonstrated similar susceptibility patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Nov;105(11):1571-5 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1989 Jul;96(7):1100-5 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1268-74 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Jul;109(7):978-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;20 Suppl 2:S346-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources