Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Aug;34(8):1880-4.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.8.1880-1884.1996.

Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains by the Etest ESBL screen

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains by the Etest ESBL screen

M G Cormican et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

Resistance to contemporary broad-spectrum beta-lactams, mediated by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) enzymes, is an increasing problem worldwide. The Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) ESBL screen uses stable gradient technology to evaluate the MIC of ceftazidime alone compared with the MIC of ceftazidime with clavulanic acid (2 micrograms/ml) to facilitate the recognition of strains expressing inhibitable enzymes. In the present study, ESBL-producing strains (17 Escherichia coli transconjugants) were studied to define "sensitive" interpretive criteria for the Etest ESBL screen. These criteria (reduction of the ceftazidime MIC by > 2 log2 dilution steps in the presence of clavulanic acid) defined a group of 92 probable ESBL-positive organisms among the 225 tested strains of Klebsiella species and E. coli having suspicious antibiogram phenotypes. With a subset of 82 clinical strains, the Etest ESBL screen was more sensitive (100%) than the disk approximation test (87%) and was more convenient. The MICs of ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin at which 50% of isolates are inhibited were 16- to 128-fold higher (coresistance) for the ESBL screen-positive group of strains than for the ESBL screen-negative group of strains. Some strains for which cephalosporin MICs were elevated and which were Etest ESBL screen negative were also cefoxitin resistant, i.e., consistent with a chromosomally mediated AmpC resistance phenotype. The Etest ESBL screen test with the ceftazidime substrate appears to be a useful method for detecting or validating the presence of enteric bacilli potentially producing this type of beta-lactamase.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;4(2):146-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):76-9 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Feb;32(2):175-9 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1988 Jul-Aug;10(4):867-78 - PubMed
    1. Infection. 1989 Sep-Oct;17(5):347-54 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms