Patients' views about physician participation in assisted suicide and euthanasia
- PMID: 8833013
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02599581
Patients' views about physician participation in assisted suicide and euthanasia
Abstract
Objective: To elucidate the effect of physician participation in physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia on the physician-patient relationship.
Design: A questionnaire administered to 228 adult patients.
Setting: A university-based family practice training program.
Patients/participants: We approached 230 individuals of at least 19 years of age who were patients in the study practice. These individuals were selected on the basis of age and gender to ensure a heterogeneous study population. Of these, 228 agreed to participate and completed the questionnaire.
Results: The majority of subjects felt that a physician who assists with suicide or performs euthanasia is capable of being a caring person (91% and 88%, respectively) and would still be able to offer emotional support to surviving family members (85% and 70%, respectively). Most also felt that a physician assisting in suicide or euthanasia would be as trustworthy as a nonparticipating physician to care for critically ill patients (90.5% and 84.6%, respectively). Five percent "likely would not" continue to see their physician if it was known that he or she assisted in suicide and 7.8% "likely would not" continue seeing their physician if it was known that this physician performed euthanasia. No individuals stated that they "definitely would not" continue seeing their doctor under either circumstance. Individuals who supported the ideas of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia were more likely to think that a physician who assisted with suicide and euthanasia could perform well in the tasks noted above and would be more likely to continue seeing such a physician (p = .001).
Conclusion: Participating in physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia does not markedly adversely affect the physician-patient relationship.
Similar articles
-
Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State.N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):89-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310206. N Engl J Med. 1994. PMID: 8208272
-
Does compassion include euthanasia? Physicians' roles in caring for the terminally ill preclude the use of euthanasia.Health Prog. 1993 Mar;74(2):44-7. Health Prog. 1993. PMID: 10124304
-
Attitudes and practices of U.S. oncologists regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 3;133(7):527-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-7-200010030-00011. Ann Intern Med. 2000. PMID: 11015165
-
Emotional and psychological effects of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia on participating physicians.Issues Law Med. 2006 Spring;21(3):187-200. Issues Law Med. 2006. PMID: 16676767 Review.
-
Patient requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide in terminal illness. The role of the psychiatrist.Psychosomatics. 1995 Sep-Oct;36(5):445-57. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71625-5. Psychosomatics. 1995. PMID: 7568652 Review.
Cited by
-
Disability-based arguments against assisted dying laws.Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):680-686. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13036. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Bioethics. 2022. PMID: 35389513 Free PMC article.
-
The impact on patient trust of legalising physician aid in dying.J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):693-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011452. J Med Ethics. 2005. PMID: 16319229 Free PMC article.
-
A psychiatric defense of aid in dying.Community Ment Health J. 1998 Dec;34(6):547-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1018754816369. Community Ment Health J. 1998. PMID: 9833196
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical