Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Jan;208(1):11-7.
doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035161.

[Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP]

[Article in German]
W Wesemann et al. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The visual abilities of infants and small children, who are unable to communicate verbally, can be determined with "objective" visual acuity tests as, e.g., preferential looking (PL) or visual evoked potentials (VEP). Both methods provide an estimate of grating visual acuity, but are unable to determine optotype visual acuity. Grating acuity, however, is not an optimum indicator for visual performance, as it is less affected than optotype acuity by pathological changes. The diagnostic relevance of objective methods may be improved by testing visual functions that are more strongly degraded by a malfunction of the fovea than is grating acuity. Visual functions such as vernier acuity and relative motion sensitivity are potential candidates.

Methods: Characteristic properties of vernier- and motion-VEP have been determined on adult subjects with a rapid-sweep-technique at various eccentricities.

Results: Both vernier and motion stimuli elicited VEP-responses at the 2nd harmonic (F2) of the stimulus frequency. A VEP-response at the fundamental frequency (F1) could be recorded with the vernier stimulus only. Foveal VEP-thresholds were very similar to psychophysical thresholds lying in the range from 11 to 25 arcsecs. The eccentricity dependence of the VEP-threshold recorded with vernier- and motion stimuli shows different cortical magnifications and supports the notion that the F1 response is related to the detection of the vernier offset, whereas the F2 response is generated by motion components of the stimuli.

Conclusions: Vernier and relative motion-related VEP thresholds can be recorded with the steady-state VEP. They may provide more sensitive tests of foveal vision loss than grating visual acuity tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources