Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Aug;6(4):266-72.

Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8840447
Clinical Trial

Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial

T Buanes et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 250) was compared with the open procedure (n = 250) in a prospective comparative study focusing on complications. Severity grade was classified according to the Toronto system. The frequency of severity grade 1 complications was equal after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (5.6%), but major complications (grade 2 and higher) were significantly more frequent in the open group (10.4 versus 3.6%). The only postoperative death occurred after open cholecystectomy. The conventional advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were also verified: The need for postoperative analgesics was significantly reduced from 7 (range, 4-16) standard opiate doses in the open group to 3 (range, 0-7) in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was reduced from 6 (range, 4-31) days after open surgery to 2 (range, 1-7) days after laparoscopic surgery and sick leave from 28 (range, 18-48) to 10 (range, 2-21) days, respectively. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the open group (16 versus 9%, p < 0.01). In our hands, laparoscopic cholecystectomy carries a lower risk of serious complications than the open procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources