Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila
- PMID: 8852849
- PMCID: PMC1206984
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.507
Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila
Abstract
Comparisons of the genetic and cytogenetic maps of three sibling species of Drosophila reveal marked differences in the frequency and cumulative distribution of crossovers during meiosis. The maps for two of these species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, have previously been described, while this report presents new map data for D. mauritiana, obtained using a set of P element markers. A genetic map covering nearly the entire genome was constructed by estimating the recombination fraction for each pair of adjacent inserts. The P-based genetic map of mauritiana is approximately 1.8 times longer than the standard melanogaster map. It appears that mauritiana has higher recombination along the entire length of each chromosome, but the difference is greates in centromere-proximal regions of the autosomes. The mauritiana autosomes show little or no centromeric recombinational suppression, a characteristic that is prominent in melanogaster. D. simulans appears to be intermediate both in terms of total map length and intensity of the autosomal centromeric effect. These interspecific differences in recombination have important evolutionary implications for DNA sequence organization and variability. In particular, mauritiana is expected to differ from melanogaster in patterns and amounts of sequence variation and transposon insertions.
Similar articles
-
Patterns of crossover distribution in Drosophila mauritiana necessitate a re-thinking of the centromere effect on crossing over.Genetics. 2025 May 8;230(1):iyaf039. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyaf039. Genetics. 2025. PMID: 40052765 Free PMC article.
-
A reanalysis of protein polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana: effects of population size and selection.Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):101-14. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017634.17098.aa. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088651
-
DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome.Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):859-69. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.859. Genetics. 1999. PMID: 10511563 Free PMC article.
-
The evolutionary genetics of the hobo transposable element in the Drosophila melanogaster complex.Genetica. 1994;93(1-3):79-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01435241. Genetica. 1994. PMID: 7813919 Review.
-
The absence of crossovers on chromosome 4 in Drosophila melanogaster: Imperfection or interesting exception?Fly (Austin). 2017 Oct 2;11(4):253-259. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2017.1321181. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Fly (Austin). 2017. PMID: 28426351 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Unusual pattern of nucleotide sequence variation at the OS-E and OS-F genomic regions of Drosophila simulans.Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):1923-35. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.068015. Epub 2007 Feb 4. Genetics. 2007. PMID: 17277360 Free PMC article.
-
Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):389-410. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.1.389. Genetics. 2002. PMID: 12019253 Free PMC article.
-
The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.Genetics. 2000 Nov;156(3):1175-90. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1175. Genetics. 2000. PMID: 11063693 Free PMC article.
-
Global patterns of sequence evolution in Drosophila.BMC Genomics. 2007 Nov 9;8:408. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-408. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17996078 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in meiotic recombination frequencies among human males.Hum Genet. 2005 Feb;116(3):172-8. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1215-6. Epub 2004 Dec 1. Hum Genet. 2005. PMID: 15578224
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases