Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 May;86(1):187-98.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.1.187.

Genetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila. IV. Allozymic similarity between D. silvestris and D. heteroneura from the island of Hawaii

Genetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila. IV. Allozymic similarity between D. silvestris and D. heteroneura from the island of Hawaii

F M Sene et al. Genetics. 1977 May.

Abstract

The species are endemic to the newest island in the archipelago and are broadly sympatric. They are easily distinguished morphologically in both sexes. Using standard electrophoretic procedures, we have examined 25 loci encoding for structural proteins from 539 silvestris and 325 heteroneura collected at three widely-separated localities where the two species are sympatric. Pairwise comparisons within and between the species show the following coefficients of genetic identity (NEI'S I): within silvestris, 0.961 +/- 0.01; within heteroneura, 0.949 +/- 0.02; between silvestris and heteroneura, 0.939 +/- 0.01. Neither the differences within nor between the species are significant. There are no fixed allelic diffrences either within or between the species. At the three areas of sympatry, the species show gene frequency differences (P less than 0.05) at 9,11 and 13 loci respectively. This is not much different from the variation within either one of the species across the three localities. The two species have similar heterozygosity (H) levels (silvestris, 0.083; heteroneura, 0.089) and percent of polymorphic loci (both 0.37). It is suggested that despite their morphological divergence, these species are much more newly formed than classical sibling species. Significant allozymic differences may not have had time to accumulate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):593-607 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595-609 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1975 Sep 5;189(4205):806-7 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):113-39 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):901-3 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources