F-16 Class A mishaps in the U.S. Air Force, 1975-93
- PMID: 8853836
F-16 Class A mishaps in the U.S. Air Force, 1975-93
Abstract
All USAF F-16 fighter Class A (major) aircraft mishaps from 1975-93 were analyzed, using records from the U.S. Air Force Safety Agency (AFSA). There were 190 Class A mishaps involving 204 F-16's and 217 aircrew during this 19-yr period. The overall Class A rate was 5.09 per 100,000 flight hours, more than double the overall USAF rate. The mishaps are categorized by year, month, time of day and model of aircraft in relation to mishap causes as determined and reported by AFSA. Formation position, phase of flight and primary cause of the mishap indicate that maneuvering, cruise and low-level phases account for the majority of the mishaps (71%), with air-to-air engagements associated with a higher proportion of pilot error (71%) than was air-to-ground (49%). Engine failure was the number one cause of mishaps (35%), and collision with the ground the next most frequent (24%). Pilot error was determined as causative in 55% of all the mishaps. Pilot error was often associated with other non-pilot related causes. Channelized attention, loss of situational awareness, and spatial disorientation accounted for approximately 30% of the total pilot error causes found. Pilot demographics, flight hour/sortie profiles, and aircrew injuries are also listed. Fatalities occurred in 27% of the mishaps, with 97% of those involving pilot errors.
Similar articles
-
Spatial disorientation mishap trends in the U.S. Air force 1993-2013.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Sep;85(9):919-24. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.3971.2014. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014. PMID: 25197890
-
Mishap trends and cause factors in naval aviation: a review of Naval Safety Center data, 1986-90.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 May;64(5):392-5. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993. PMID: 8503813
-
Flight experience and the likelihood of U.S. Navy aircraft mishaps.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992 Jan;63(1):72-4. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992. PMID: 1550538
-
Multisensory cueing for enhancing orientation information during flight.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B186-90. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007. PMID: 17547319 Review.
-
Reduce risk of inducing spatial disorientation using physiologically compatible ground lighting.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Jun;70(6):598-603. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999. PMID: 10373053 Review.
Cited by
-
Human manual control performance in hyper-gravity.Exp Brain Res. 2015 May;233(5):1409-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4215-y. Epub 2015 Feb 5. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25651980
-
The Brain Is Faster than the Hand in Split-Second Intentions to Respond to an Impending Hazard: A Simulation of Neuroadaptive Automation to Speed Recovery to Perturbation in Flight Attitude.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;10:187. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00187. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27199710 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical