Costs and benefits of cervical screening. II. Is it worthwhile reducing the screening interval from 5 to 3 years?
- PMID: 8853970
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.40082400.x
Costs and benefits of cervical screening. II. Is it worthwhile reducing the screening interval from 5 to 3 years?
Abstract
A reduction in screening interval from 5 years to 3 years would greatly increase the cost of the programme, but would save few extra lives. The cost per life saved would be around 250,000 Pounds at 1995 prices, or around 8000 Pounds per life per year saved. There would in addition be human costs for the women screened. The opportunity cost of reducing the interval may be too great, since it is likely that the Health Service would achieve greater health benefits by investing the funds in other health care activities.
Similar articles
-
Costs and benefits of cervical screening. III. Cost/benefit analysis of a call of previously unscreened women.Cytopathology. 1996 Aug;7(4):249-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.40182401.x. Cytopathology. 1996. PMID: 8853971
-
Costs and benefits of cervical screening. I. The costs of the cervical screening programme.Cytopathology. 1996 Aug;7(4):231-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.39982399.x. Cytopathology. 1996. PMID: 8853969
-
Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?Nurs Times. 2001 Jul 19-25;97(29):20. Nurs Times. 2001. PMID: 11957496 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of cervical cytology.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999 Jan;(5):1-6. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999. PMID: 11925972 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(18):1-73. Health Technol Assess. 2000. PMID: 10932023 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Willingness to pay for cancer prevention.Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(4):299-312. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927040-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009. PMID: 19485426 Review.
-
How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jun;52(479):485-90. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12051215 Free PMC article. Review.