The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint
- PMID: 8854317
- DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199608000-00006
The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint
Abstract
The indications for open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures associated with a clinically stable hip joint are unclear. In previous work a large posterior wall defect (27% articular surface area) resulted in significant alteration of load transmission across the hip; specifically, there was a transition from evenly distributed loading along the acetabular articular surface to loading concentrated mainly in the superior portion of the articular surface during simulated single leg stance. However, the majority of posterior wall fractures involve a smaller amount of the articular surface. Posterior wall acetabular fractures not associated with instability of the hip are commonly treated nonoperatively. This practice does not account for the size of the posterior wall fracture. To study the biomechanical consequences of variably sized articular defects, a laboratory experiment was conducted evaluating three progressively larger posterior wall defects of the acetabulum during simulated single leg stance using superlow Fuji prescale film (Itochu International, New York): (a) 1/3 articular surface width through a 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum, (b) 2/3, and (c) 3/3 articular width defects through the same 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum. In the intact acetabulum, 48% of the total articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum. Twenty-eight percent of articular contact was in the anterior wall region of the acetabulum and 24% in the posterior wall region. After the 1/3 width posterior wall defect, 64% of the articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0011). The 2/3 width posterior wall defect resulted in 71% of articular contact area being located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0006). After the 3/3 width posterior wall defect, 77% of articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum, significantly greater than the intact condition (p < 0.0001) and 1/3 width defect (p = 0.0222). The total absolute contact areas for all defect conditions were significantly less than the intact conditions. The results of this study reconfirm the observation that posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum significantly alter the articular contact characteristics in the hip during single leg stance. The relationship between defect size and changes in joint contact showed that the smallest defect resulted in the greatest alteration in joint contact areas, whereas larger defects resulted in minor increments of change in contact area. This finding is of concern because the clinical practice of managing acetabular fractures nonoperatively if the hip joint is stable is based on the supposition that the joint retains enough integrity to function without undue risk of late posttraumatic osteoarthritis. A better understanding of the natural history of stable posterior wall acetabular fractures is needed to ascertain whether some of these fractures merit operative repair.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical evaluation of a low anterior wall fracture: correlation with the CT subchondral arc.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Mar-Apr;12(3):152-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199803000-00003. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9553854
-
Augmentation of posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation using calcium-phosphate cement: a biomechanical analysis.J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Oct;21(9):608-16. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181591397. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. PMID: 17921835
-
Consequences of transverse acetabular fracture malreduction on load transmission across the hip joint.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Feb;12(2):90-100. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9503297
-
Biomechanics of the hip joint and the effects of fracture of the acetabulum.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jun;(339):92-104. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00013. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997. PMID: 9186206 Review.
-
[Reconstruction of fractures of the anterior wall and the anterior column of the acetabulum using an ilioinguinal approach].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Sep;21(3):236-50. doi: 10.1007/s00064-009-1802-8. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009. PMID: 19779681 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical comparison of different stabilization constructs for unstable posterior wall fractures of acetabulum. A cadaveric study.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e82993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082993. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24391733 Free PMC article.
-
Traumatic Hip Dislocations in an Orthopedic Center in Lagos.Niger Med J. 2018 Mar-Apr;59(2):20-23. doi: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_139_18. Niger Med J. 2018. PMID: 31263318 Free PMC article.
-
Finite element analysis of the stability of combined plate internal fixation in posterior wall fractures of acetabulum.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13393-7. eCollection 2015. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015. PMID: 26550272 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Pelvic Ramus Fracture on the Stability of Fixed Pelvic Complex Fracture.Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:790575. doi: 10.1155/2015/790575. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015. PMID: 26495033 Free PMC article.
-
Cartilage contact pressure elevations in dysplastic hips: a chronic overload model.J Orthop Surg Res. 2006 Oct 3;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-1-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2006. PMID: 17150126 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical