In vitro femoral stiffness after femoral neck osteotomy and osteosynthesis with defined surgical errors
- PMID: 8854320
- DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199608000-00009
In vitro femoral stiffness after femoral neck osteotomy and osteosynthesis with defined surgical errors
Abstract
In our search for an osteosynthesis device that would tolerate the surgical errors of the inexperienced surgeon, we tested in vitro femoral stiffness in 75 human osteoporotic femora after internal fixation of a cervical neck osteotomy using three commonly used devices: two von Bahr screws (A. Ericsson AB, Sweden), two cannulated screws (Uppsala type, Olmed AB, Sweden), and two hookpins (LiH, PSAB, Sweden). The first device has its main grip in the cancellous bone by threads; the second has grip in cancellous and subchondral bone by threads; and the third, which has no threads, has its grip in cancellous bone by a hook pin. The intact specimen was in all instances stiffer (22-63%) than the osteosynthesized specimen (p < 0.001). An osteosynthesized femur with perfectly reduced bone ends was 14-23% stiffer than when reduction of the bone ends was insufficient, irrespective of device malposition (p < 0.001). Insufficient reduction of the osteotomy leaving a 20 degrees dorsal angulation of the femoral head combined with too far ventrally placed screws resulted in the lowest femoral stiffness. If reduction of osteotomy was sufficient, screws placed too far ventrally or converging screws did not result in decreased stiffness compared with optimal screw placement. Irrespective of the quality of reduction, osteosynthesis with the Uppsala screw resulted in all instances in a higher stiffness than using the other devices (p < 0.01). With the Uppsala screw design, femoral stiffness after optimal osteosynthesis was reduced by 22% compared with the intact femur, and in the most unfavorable position with combined malreduction and malpositioning it was reduced by 42%. Corresponding values for the von Bahr screws were 29% and 46%, respectively, and for the LiH screws 47% and 63%, respectively. Use of a device with threads and grip in the subchondral bone is recommended for fixation of femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic bone. Furthermore, the importance of anatomical reduction for fracture fixation is emphasized.
Similar articles
-
Femoral stiffness after osteosynthesis of a subcapital osteotomy in osteoporotic bone: an in-vitro comparison of nine fixation methods.J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(6):464-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199509060-00002. J Orthop Trauma. 1995. PMID: 8592258
-
Does a trochanteric lag screw improve fixation of vertically oriented femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical analysis in cadaveric bone.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Oct;28(8):886-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013. PMID: 24050951
-
Bone mineral content and fixation strength of femoral neck fractures. A cadaver study.Acta Orthop Scand. 1994 Apr;65(2):161-5. doi: 10.3109/17453679408995426. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994. PMID: 8197849
-
Novel Treatment Options for the Surgical Management of Young Femoral Neck Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-S37. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001368. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 30540670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001365. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 30540669 Review.
Cited by
-
The orthopaedic treatment of fragility fractures.Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2007 May;4(2):108-16. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2007. PMID: 22461210 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical