Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Aug;44(2):109-11.
doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70125-6.

Neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure in patients with proximal colon cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure in patients with proximal colon cancer

G T Lemmel et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Current American Cancer Society recommendations are that persons aged 50 years or older undergo screening flexible sigmoidoscopy every 3 to 5 years. In clinical practice, persons with adenomas at sigmoidoscopy are generally referred for full colonoscopy. However, cancers proximal to the splenic flexure may not be accompanied by neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure.

Methods: In order to estimate how often screening flexible sigmoidoscopy would be negative in persons with proximal cancer, we retrospectively reviewed 2053 consecutive colorectal cancer cases diagnosed from 1988 to 1994. Seven hundred ninety-nine (38.9%) had tumors proximal to the splenic flexure. We selected 358 study cases based on full colonoscopy performed and the colonoscopy reports available.

Results: Colonoscopy demonstrated distal adenomas in 77 cases (21.5%): 29 (8.1%) had hyperplastic polyps only, 4 (1.1%) had synchronous cancer, and 248 (69.3%) had no distal polyps. In this population, 77.4% of patients with proximal colon cancer had no distal neoplasia. We estimate that 30% of all patients with colorectal cancer would have a negative screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Conclusions: Prospective evaluation of colonoscopic findings in persons with proximal cancers is needed. Ongoing evaluation of colonoscopy as a general screening test is appropriate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources