Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: the influence of cubicles and indoor and outdoor walking surfaces
- PMID: 8863400
- DOI: 10.1136/vr.139.6.130
Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: the influence of cubicles and indoor and outdoor walking surfaces
Abstract
A survey of cubicles and indoor and outdoor walking surfaces on 37 farms served by four veterinary practices in Somerset, Cheshire, Wirral and west. Wales was carried out in 1989 to 1991. A study of the space requirements of Friesian/Holstein cows at pasture showed that they required approximately 240 cm x 120 cm lying space and a further 60 cm lunging space for rising. By these standards, 87 per cent of the cubicles were too short and 50 per cent were too wide or too narrow. Over 1500 observations on cows lying down, rising and standing indicated that only 12 per cent of the cubicles permitted real freedom of movement; 91 per cent of top partition rails were judged to be too low and 70 per cent of bottom rails too low or too high. In addition, the kerb was very high in 76 per cent of the cubicles. As a result, 10 per cent of cows appeared moderately or severely restricted when lying down, 33 per cent when rising and 55 per cent when standing. Over 2000 cubicle beds were also studied; 75 per cent had a concrete base and of those, 63 per cent were judged to have too little bedding and 11 per cent next to none. Higher incidences and prevalences of lameness were associated with limited borrowing space (P < 0.01) low bottom rails (P < 0.05), high kerbs (P < 0.05) and inadequate bedding (P < 0.01). Of 3190 walking surfaces, only 25 per cent were classified as satisfactory in the first winter and 34 per cent in the second. In general, surfaces in silage bays were too rough and those in other sites were too smooth. The farms with the smoothest indoor walking surfaces had a significantly higher incidence of lameness (P < 0.01). Of 3335 outdoor walking surfaces only 25 per cent were classified as satisfactory, and 70 per cent were too rough. The incidence of lameness was not significantly related to these findings.
Similar articles
-
Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle.Animal. 2020 Sep;14(9):1934-1942. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000609. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Animal. 2020. PMID: 32264993 Free PMC article.
-
Do International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR) dimension recommendations for loose housing of cows improve animal welfare?J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10235-10249. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16154. Epub 2019 Aug 22. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 31447147
-
Effects of season, herd size, management system and veterinary practice on the lameness incidence in dairy cattle.Vet Rec. 1983 Nov 5;113(19):441-5. doi: 10.1136/vr.113.19.441. Vet Rec. 1983. PMID: 6649378
-
A descriptive review of the prevalence and risk factors of hock lesions in dairy cows.Vet J. 2014 Nov;202(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Vet J. 2014. PMID: 25201250 Review.
-
Aspects of lameness in pasture based dairy systems.Vet J. 2019 Feb;244:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Vet J. 2019. PMID: 30825900 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing hoof health and locomotion in crossbred dairy cows: impact of recycled manure solids bedding on lameness incidence and gait kinematics.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Aug 22;56(7):242. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04088-7. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024. PMID: 39172345
-
A Cross-Sectional Study Into the Prevalence of Dairy Cattle Lameness and Associated Herd-Level Risk Factors in England and Wales.Front Vet Sci. 2018 Apr 5;5:65. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00065. eCollection 2018. Front Vet Sci. 2018. PMID: 29675419 Free PMC article.
-
Lameness and claw lesions of the Norwegian red dairy cattle housed in free stalls in relation to environment, parity and stage of lactation.Acta Vet Scand. 2005;46(4):203-17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-46-203. Acta Vet Scand. 2005. PMID: 16398332 Free PMC article.
-
Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.EFSA J. 2009 Jul 9;7(7):1143r. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1143r. eCollection 2009 Jul. EFSA J. 2009. PMID: 32313580 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Animal Welfare Risks in Live Cattle Export from Australia to China by Sea.Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;11(10):2862. doi: 10.3390/ani11102862. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34679886 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials