Neural network based on the input organization of an identified neuron signaling impending collision
- PMID: 8867110
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.3.967
Neural network based on the input organization of an identified neuron signaling impending collision
Abstract
1. We describe a four-layered neural network (Fig. 1), based on the input organization of a collision signaling neuron in the visual system of the locust, the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD). The 250 photoreceptors ("P" units) in layer 1 are excited by any change in illumination, generated when an image edge passes over them. Layers 2 and 3 incorporate both excitatory and inhibitory interactions, and layer 4 consists of a single output element, equivalent to the locust LGMD. 2. The output element of the neural network, the "LGMD", responds directionally when challenged with approaching versus receding objects, preferring approaching objects (Figs. 2-4). The time course and shape of the "LGMD" response matches that of the LGMD (Fig. 4). Directionality is maintained with objects of various sizes and approach velocities. The network is tuned to direct approach (Fig. 5). The "LGMD" shows no directional selectivity for translatory motion at a constant velocity across the "eye", but its response increases with edge velocity (Figs. 6 and 9). 3. The critical image cues for a selective response to object approach by the "LGMD" are edges that change in extent or in velocity as they move (Fig. 7). Lateral inhibition is crucial to the selectivity of the "LGMD" and the selective response is abolished or else much reduced if lateral inhibition is taken out of the network (Fig. 7). We conclude that lateral inhibition in the neuronal network for the locust LGMD also underlies the experimentally observed critical image cues for its directional response. 4. Lateral inhibition shapes the velocity tuning of the network for objects moving in the X and Y directions without approaching the eye (see Fig. 1). As an edge moves over the eye at a constant velocity, a race occurs between the excitation that is caused by edge movement and which passes down the network and the inhibition that passes laterally. Excitation must win this race for units in layer 3 to reach threshold (Fig. 8). The faster the edge moves over the eye the more units in layer 3 reach threshold and pass excitation on to the "LGMD" (Fig. 9). 5. Lateral inhibition shapes the tuning of the network for objects moving in the Z direction, toward or away from the eye (see Fig. 1). As an object approaches the eye there is a buildup of excitation in the "LGMD" throughout the movement whereas the response to object recession is often brief, particularly for high velocities. During object motion, a critical race occurs between excitation passing down the network and inhibition directed laterally, excitation must win this race for the rapid buildup in excitation in the "LGMD" as seen in the final stages of object approach (Figs. 10-12). The buildup is eliminated if, during object approach, excitation cannot win this race (as happens when the spread of inhibition laterally takes < 1 ms Fig. 13, D and E). Taking all lateral inhibition away increases the "LGMD" response to object approach, but overall directional selectivity is reduced as there is also a lot of residual network excitation following object recession (Fig. 13B). 6. Directional selectivity for rapidly approaching objects is further enhanced at the level of the "LGMD" by the timing of a feed-forward, inhibitory loop onto the "LGMD", activated when a large number of receptor units are excited in a short time. The inhibitory loop is activated at the end of object approach, truncating the excitatory "LGMD" response after approach has ceased, but at the initiation of object recession (*Fig. 2, 3, and 13). Eliminating the feed-forward, inhibitory loop prolongs the "LGMD" response to both receding and approaching objects (Fig. 13F).
Similar articles
-
Intracellular characterization of neurons in the locust brain signaling impending collision.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Mar;75(3):986-95. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.3.986. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8867111
-
Time-dependent activation of feed-forward inhibition in a looming-sensitive neuron.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):2150-61. doi: 10.1152/jn.00411.2005. Epub 2005 May 31. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15928055 Free PMC article.
-
Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects.J Neurophysiol. 1992 Nov;68(5):1654-66. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.5.1654. J Neurophysiol. 1992. PMID: 1479436
-
Motion detectors in the locust visual system: From biology to robot sensors.Microsc Res Tech. 2002 Feb 15;56(4):256-69. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10029. Microsc Res Tech. 2002. PMID: 11877801 Review.
-
Visual processing of the motion of an object in three dimensions for a stationary or a moving observer.Perception. 1995;24(1):87-103. doi: 10.1068/p240087. Perception. 1995. PMID: 7617421 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-linear neuronal responses as an emergent property of afferent networks: a case study of the locust lobula giant movement detector.PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Mar 12;6(3):e1000701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000701. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010. PMID: 20300653 Free PMC article.
-
Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of a looming-sensitive neuron in solitarious and gregarious phases of the desert locust.J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):779-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.00855.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 2. J Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 19955292 Free PMC article.
-
A pair of motion-sensitive neurons in the locust encode approaches of a looming object.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010 Dec;196(12):927-38. doi: 10.1007/s00359-010-0576-7. Epub 2010 Sep 9. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010. PMID: 20827481
-
Re-framing bio-plausible collision detection: identifying shared meta-properties through strategic prototyping.Front Neurorobot. 2024 Jan 25;18:1349498. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1349498. eCollection 2024. Front Neurorobot. 2024. PMID: 38333372 Free PMC article.
-
Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best.Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 7;271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S27-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0096. Proc Biol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15101410 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous