Malaria vaccine trials: the missing qualitative data

Abstract

Recent population-based efficacy trials of the synthetic malaria vaccine SPf66 have shown restricted, if any, clinical protection against Plasmodium falciparum infection. Despite the well-established role of antibodies in effector responses against asexual blood-stage malaria parasites, the titres of anti-SPf66 IgG antibodies do not correlate with the ability of sera from vaccine recipients to inhibit parasite growth in vitro nor with partial clinical protection which could be detected in some trials. Qualitative or functional parameters of SP66-induced antibody responses, such as IgG subclass composition and affinity, may be more predictive of clinical protection against malaria than quantitative estimates of antibody concentration or titre. Since these parameters are readily estimated by laboratory techniques currently available, and may be modulated by changes in vaccination protocols and by the use of different adjuvants, a better understanding of qualitative antibody responses induced by SPf66 and other asexual blood-stage malaria vaccine candidates, and of their relationship with clinical protection in vivo, is urgently needed for the improvement of currently used immunization schedules.