Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Aug;7(6):575-9.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010673.

5-Fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus alpha-interferon as treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A randomized study

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

5-Fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus alpha-interferon as treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A randomized study

P Dufour et al. Ann Oncol. 1996 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: In 1989, S. Wadler reported very promising results (76% response rate) with a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus alpha-2a interferon (IFN) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC). In vitro, there are several potential explanations for synergism between the two agents. We therefore decided in 1989 to start a randomized study comparing 5-FU alone with 5-FU plus IFN.

Patients and methods: 105 non-pretreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma entered into this study. The patients were randomly allocated either in arm A (n = 49) with 5-FU: 750 mg/m2 i.v. CI d1-d5 followed by 750 mg/m2 i.v. bolus once a week, or in arm B (n = 56) with 5-FU as in arm A plus IFN 9 x 10(6) IU sub-cutaneously three times a week.

Results: After two months of treatment we observed 1 CR and 2 PR in arm A (response rate 6.1%), 3 CR and 8 PR in arm B (response rate 19.6%), i.e., a significant difference (P = 0.05). Event-free survival was significantly higher in arm B (6 months) than in arm A (2 months) (P < 0.01), while median survival was slightly higher in arm B (12 months) than in arm A (10 months) (P < 0.05). For overall survival the difference was not significant after adjustment on center treatment and baseline Karnofsky status (P = 0.13). Toxicity was also greater in arm B. Sixteen percent of patients in arm A and 36% in arm B experienced certain grade 3-4 side effects (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: 5-FU plus IFN is more effective than 5-FU alone in terms of response rate, event free survival but not of overall survival. 5-FU plus IFN is more toxic. As IFN has no demonstrated efficacy in MCRC as a single agent, this study suggests that IFN is acting as a 5-FU modulatory agent. The response rate observed (19.6%) is similar to the results obtained elsewhere with 5-FU plus leucovorin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources