Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem
- PMID: 8880166
- DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<297::AID-HEC216>3.0.CO;2-T
Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem
Erratum in
- Health Econ 1999 Sep;8(6):559
Abstract
Application of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is growing rapidly in health care. Two general approaches to analysis are differentiated by the type of data available: (i) deterministic models based upon secondary analysis of retrospective data from one or more trials and other sources; and (ii) stochastic analyses in which the design of a randomized controlled trial is adapted to collect prospectively patient-specific data on costs and effectiveness. An important methodological difference between these two approaches is in how uncertainty is handled. Deterministic CEA models typically rely upon sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of findings to alternative assumptions, whereas stochastic (CEA) analysis, as part of prospective studies, permits the use of conventional statistical methods on the cost and effectiveness data for both inference (hypothesis testing) and estimation. This paper presents a procedure for the statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness data, with specific application to those studies for which effectiveness is measured as a binary outcome. Specifically, Fieller's Theorem was used to calculate confidence intervals for ratios of the two random variables of between-treatment differences in observed costs and effectiveness, i.e. the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Similar articles
-
Design and analysis issues for economic analysis alongside clinical trials.Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S14-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a31971. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19536012 Review.
-
Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared.Health Econ. 2010 Mar;19(3):316-33. doi: 10.1002/hec.1477. Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 19378353
-
Statistical cost-effectiveness analysis of two treatments based on net health benefits.Stat Med. 2001 Apr 30;20(8):1279-302. doi: 10.1002/sim.774. Stat Med. 2001. PMID: 11304742
-
Estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an example from a randomized trial.Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1447-58. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1447::AID-SIM267>3.0.CO;2-V. Stat Med. 1996. PMID: 8841654 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness as an outcome in randomized clinical trials.Clin Trials. 2006;3(6):543-51. doi: 10.1177/1740774506073105. Clin Trials. 2006. PMID: 17170039 Review.
Cited by
-
A randomized noninferiority trial evaluating remotely-delivered stepped care for depression using internet cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and telephone CBT.Behav Res Ther. 2019 Dec;123:103485. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103485. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Behav Res Ther. 2019. PMID: 31634738 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.BMJ. 2009 Jun 24;338:b2307. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2307. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19553269 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 19;6:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-52. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16623946 Free PMC article.
-
The probability of cost-effectiveness.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-5. Epub 2002 Mar 11. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002. PMID: 11914138 Free PMC article.
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 24. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30685318 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical