The use of a surgical assist device to reduce glove perforations in postdelivery vaginal repair: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 8885737
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80014-7
The use of a surgical assist device to reduce glove perforations in postdelivery vaginal repair: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of a surgical assist device, SutureMate, to decrease glove perforations during postdelivery vaginal repair.
Study design: This was a prospective randomized trial. After delivery surgeons who needed to perform vaginal repair were randomized to use the surgical assist device or to perform the repair in the usual fashion. After the repair, gloves were collected and the operator was asked to complete a standardized data form that was submitted with the gloves. The gloves were tested for perforations within 24 hours by the Food and Drug Administration-approved hydrosufflation technique. Comparisons were made with chi(2) statistics with p < 0.01 taken as being statistically significant with the use of a Bonferoni adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Results: A total of 476 glove sets were evaluated. The use of the surgical assist device significantly reduced the overall glove perforation rate from 28.3% in the control arm to 8.4% in the study arm (p = 0.0001). Rates of perforation varied with level of training and expertise but fell in all groups that used the device. Family physicians had the highest perforation rate in the control arm and benefited most from the device. A total of 76% of perforations were located in the thumb, index, and second fingers of the nondominant hand. Perforations were recognized in only 16% of the glove sets. The level of satisfaction with the device was mixed, but overall 50% of operators indicated that they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the device.
Conclusion: The rate of glove perforation in postdelivery vaginal repair is high. The surgical assist device significantly reduced the rate of glove perforations.
Similar articles
-
The use of blunt needles does not reduce glove perforations during obstetrical laceration repair.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):641.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.028. Epub 2008 Jul 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18639205 Clinical Trial.
-
Role of blunt suture needle in episiotomy repair at uncomplicated vaginal deliveries in reducing glove perforation rate: a randomized controlled trial.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 May;38(5):787-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01790.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012. PMID: 22414094 Clinical Trial.
-
Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1354-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90764-9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8498411
-
Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations.Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):90-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00145-8. Am J Prev Med. 2000. PMID: 10793285 Review.
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD009170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009170.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 22071864 Free PMC article.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
-
Use of safety scalpels and other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: what is the evidence?Can J Surg. 2013 Aug;56(4):263-9. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003812. Can J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23883497 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical