Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review)
- PMID: 8886061
- DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00231-2
Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review)
Abstract
Objectives: Significant obesity is considered to be a relative contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. This study reviews the complications encountered in massively obese patients undergoing urologic laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: Body mass index (BMI) was used as an objective index to indicate massive obesity. Eleven institutions compiled retrospective data on 125 patients having a BMI greater than 30. Procedures performed included 76 pelvic lymph node dissections, 14 nephrectomies, 7 bladder neck suspensions, and 28 miscellaneous procedures.
Results: For the group as a whole, the mean BMI was 35.1 (range 30.1 to 57.2). Mean operative time was 202 minutes (range 60 to 480). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 15 of the 125 patients (12%). Complication rates (minor and major) were 22% (27 occurrences in 125 patients) intraoperatively and 26% (33 occurrences in 125 patients) postoperatively. The major complications included 2 trocar injuries to abdominal wall vessels, 1 bladder injury, 3 peripheral nerve injuries, 1 dysrhythmia, 1 deep vein thrombosis, 1 wound seroma, 1 nephrocutaneous fistula, 1 incisional hernia, and 1 death.
Conclusions: In this review, complication rates for urologic laparoscopic surgery on massively obese patients were higher than in the general population undergoing laparoscopic surgery (0.3% to 21%).
Comment in
-
Marked obesity and laparoscopic bladder neck suspension.Urology. 1997 Oct;50(4):657. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)80030-1. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9338755 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations.Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):247-52; discussion 252. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.077. Urology. 2004. PMID: 14972463
-
Obesity and laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias.Surg Endosc. 2001 Dec;15(12):1419-22. doi: 10.1007/s004640080077. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11965457
-
Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):708-15; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054. Surgery. 2005. PMID: 16269300
-
[Surgery for morbid obesity: 2. Complications. Results of a Technologic Evaluation by the ANAES].J Chir (Paris). 2003 Feb;140(1):4-21. J Chir (Paris). 2003. PMID: 12709648 Review. French.
-
Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and outcomes.J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.133. Epub 2010 Jun 19. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20639022 Review.
Cited by
-
The altruistic elderly, a valuable but unrecognised kidney donor group. A case report of an 85-year-old unspecified kidney donor.BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 27;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03511-8. BMC Geriatr. 2022. PMID: 36303107 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary open partial nephrectomy is associated with diminished procedure-specific morbidity despite increasing technical challenges: a single institutional experience.World J Urol. 2010 Aug;28(4):507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0510-1. Epub 2010 Jan 30. World J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20119642
-
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique, oncologic efficacy, and safety.Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Feb;6(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0063-9. Curr Urol Rep. 2005. PMID: 15610693 Review.
-
Impact of Obesity on Complications of Laparoscopic Simple or Radical Nephrectomy.Curr Urol. 2015 Sep;8(3):149-55. doi: 10.1159/000365707. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Curr Urol. 2015. PMID: 26889135 Free PMC article.
-
Superior Mesenteric Artery Injury During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Robotic Nightmare.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Feb 26;38:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.002. eCollection 2022 Apr. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35243398 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical