Clinical and laboratory features of patients with loiasis (Loa loa filariasis) in the U.K

Abstract

To assess differences between Africans and expatriates, we reviewed records of 100 patients with loiasis presenting to The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. Fifty-one were black Africans, and 49 were white expatriates. A history of Calabar swellings was more common amongst expatriates (P = 0.0001, OR 8.1), whilst eyeworm was reported more frequently in Africans (P = 0.0038, OR 4.2). Higher eosinophil levels (P < 0.0001) and filarial antibody levels, whether measured by immunofluorescence (P = 0.047) or ELISA (P < 0.0001) were present in the expatriates. Africans were more likely to have microfilaraemia (P < 0.0025, OR 7.3), and among microfilaraemic patients, Africans had denser microfilaraemia (P = 0.012). The sensitivity of microfilaremia as a screening test for loiasis was 75% in Africans and 29% in expatriates. The sensitivities of filarial antibody tests in Africans and expatriates were 81% and 100% for IFAT, and 28% and 93% for ELISA. Following treatment, 63% of patients were considered cured, 25% were lost to follow-up and 12% had a documented relapse. The differences between the two groups of patients could be caused by differences in the chronicity of loiasis, but other explanations are also discussed.