HLA-B27 determination using serological methods. A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and a microlymphocytotoxic test with flow cytometry and a molecular biological assay
- PMID: 8893373
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01409980
HLA-B27 determination using serological methods. A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and a microlymphocytotoxic test with flow cytometry and a molecular biological assay
Abstract
Typing for HLA-B27 is routinely performed in patients with seronegative spondarthritides. Besides the microlymphocytotoxic test (MLCT), other serological techniques have been developed such as enzyme immunoassays (EIA) using serum or plasma as a source for the determination of soluble HLA-B27 (sHLA-B27) and flow cytometric (FC) methods. The aim of the present study was to check the accuracy and reliability of the EIA for sHLA-B27 in comparison to the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and cross-reacting specificities (CRS), as well as an FC method and a molecular biological method. Any discrepant results should be typed with the MLCT using a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies, with FC and with a molecular biological technique. The EIA should also be repeated in those patients, using serum and plasma from a new venipuncture. In 81 patients with rheumatic disorders, the EIA and the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS were performed. Based on the MLCT with a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies as a standard, discrepant test results were obtained for 9 out of 81 patients with the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS and with the EIA. The following wrong results occurred: in the MLCT with anti-HLA-B27 and CRS, there were two false-negative results; in the EIA there were four false-negative and one false-positive results; one sample was undeterminable. In comparison with the MLCT, including the complete panel of HLA-class I antibodies, as well as with a molecular biological technique, typing with FC showed a complete concordance. Our investigations demonstrated that for routine typing for HLA-B27 the MLCT cannot be replaced by EIA because of a significant number of mistypings. The MLCT performed only with antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS may also lead to typing errors. No errors were detected using flow cytometry. If only serological methods can be performed in a laboratory a combination of flow cytometry and MLCT could therefore enhance the safety of HLA-B27 typing.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of four monoclonal antibodies against HLA-B27 for their reliability in HLA-B27 typing with flow cytometry (FC): comparison with the classic microlymphocytotoxic test (MLCT).Cytometry. 1996 Sep 15;26(3):209-15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960915)26:3<209::AID-CYTO5>3.0.CO;2-9. Cytometry. 1996. PMID: 8889393
-
False-negative serological HLA-B27 typing results may be due to altered antigenic epitopes and can be detected by polymerase chain reaction.Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;36(2):185-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.2.185. Br J Rheumatol. 1997. PMID: 9133926
-
Failure of the serological determination of HLA-B27 due to antigen masking in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Rheumatol Int. 1993;13(4):163-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00301265. Rheumatol Int. 1993. PMID: 8310210
-
[HLA-B27 in Bechterew's disease].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 Apr 30;120(11):1317-22. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000. PMID: 10868094 Review. Norwegian.
-
Report of the second international soluble HLA (sHLA) workshop. Phoenix, Arizona, October 2, 1993.Hum Immunol. 1994 Jul;40(3):153-65. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90062-0. Hum Immunol. 1994. PMID: 7960956 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Optimization of an in-house PCR method for the detection of HLA-B*27 alleles.Biomed Rep. 2018 Apr;8(4):385-390. doi: 10.3892/br.2018.1055. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Biomed Rep. 2018. PMID: 29541460 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials