Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996;16(3):95-100.
doi: 10.1007/BF01409980.

HLA-B27 determination using serological methods. A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and a microlymphocytotoxic test with flow cytometry and a molecular biological assay

Affiliations
Comparative Study

HLA-B27 determination using serological methods. A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and a microlymphocytotoxic test with flow cytometry and a molecular biological assay

A Dunky et al. Rheumatol Int. 1996.

Abstract

Typing for HLA-B27 is routinely performed in patients with seronegative spondarthritides. Besides the microlymphocytotoxic test (MLCT), other serological techniques have been developed such as enzyme immunoassays (EIA) using serum or plasma as a source for the determination of soluble HLA-B27 (sHLA-B27) and flow cytometric (FC) methods. The aim of the present study was to check the accuracy and reliability of the EIA for sHLA-B27 in comparison to the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and cross-reacting specificities (CRS), as well as an FC method and a molecular biological method. Any discrepant results should be typed with the MLCT using a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies, with FC and with a molecular biological technique. The EIA should also be repeated in those patients, using serum and plasma from a new venipuncture. In 81 patients with rheumatic disorders, the EIA and the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS were performed. Based on the MLCT with a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies as a standard, discrepant test results were obtained for 9 out of 81 patients with the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS and with the EIA. The following wrong results occurred: in the MLCT with anti-HLA-B27 and CRS, there were two false-negative results; in the EIA there were four false-negative and one false-positive results; one sample was undeterminable. In comparison with the MLCT, including the complete panel of HLA-class I antibodies, as well as with a molecular biological technique, typing with FC showed a complete concordance. Our investigations demonstrated that for routine typing for HLA-B27 the MLCT cannot be replaced by EIA because of a significant number of mistypings. The MLCT performed only with antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS may also lead to typing errors. No errors were detected using flow cytometry. If only serological methods can be performed in a laboratory a combination of flow cytometry and MLCT could therefore enhance the safety of HLA-B27 typing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Clin Biochem. 1992 Nov;29 ( Pt 6):663-7 - PubMed
    1. Tissue Antigens. 1995 Mar;45(3):169-76 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;6(4):371-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Invest Med. 1992 Aug;15(4):371-5 - PubMed
    1. Immunogenetics. 1988;27(3):203-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources