Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Oct;12(3):359-62.
doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80257-7.

The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia

Affiliations
Free article

The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia

S Singh et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients presenting with limb-threatening ischaemia were studied prospectively to determine treatment and rehabilitation costs in the first year. Limb salvage was attempted in 104 (69%) patients but failed in 13%. Mortality at 1 year was 27%. The cost of treatment, inpatient stay, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, convalescence, disablement services, home adaptations, home care, district nursing, transportation and outpatient visits were determined for each patient. The patients were classified according to their presentation and initial treatment into five groups (number of patients) whose median management costs (interquartile range) for 12 months were: Gp 1 (23 - Revascularisation for acute ischaemia = 3970 pounds (2984-5511) Gp 2 (29) - Angioplasty for critical ischaemia = 6611 pounds (3630-10,200) Gp 3 (52) - Reconstruction for critical ischaemia = 6766 pounds (4337-9677) Gp 4 (34) - Primary amputation = 10,162 pounds (7894-13,026) Gp 5 (12) - Primary bilateral amputations = 13,848 pounds (11,440-18,056) At 1 year, there was no significant difference in the cost of managing a patient with a critically ischaemic limb by angioplasty or surgical reconstruction. The cost of revascularisation for acute ischaemia was comparatively low because these patients required minimal rehabilitation. The median cost of managing a patient following amputation was almost twice that of successful limb salvage justifying an aggressive revascularisation policy. However, justification of such a policy on economic grounds requires salvage failure episode to be minimised as they increase costs considerably.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources