Patient-controlled propofol sedation for elderly patients: safety and patient attitude toward control
- PMID: 8896852
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03011902
Patient-controlled propofol sedation for elderly patients: safety and patient attitude toward control
Abstract
Purpose: Little information is available regarding the use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) among elderly patients undergoing operative procedures under local or regional anaesthesia. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the safety of propofol PCS, and the attitude among elderly patients toward self-administration of sedation during cataract surgery.
Methods: Prospective, randomized study conducted in a University affiliated, tertiary-care hospital. Fifty-five elderly patients (aged 65-79 yr) were randomized to receive propofol patient-controlled sedation (PCS) (n = 28) or no intraoperative sedation (n = 27) during cataract surgery performed under peribulbar block. The PCS parameters consisted of a lockout interval of three minutes and a PCS dose of 0.3 mg.kg-1. Study groups were compared with respect to sedation, anxiety and discomfort visual analogue scores (VAS), cognitive functioning, patient satisfaction and the incidence of intraoperative complications.
Results: Patients in the PCS group administered a mean propofol dose of 65 +/- 49 mg during procedures with a mean duration of 46 min. The incidence of intraoperative complications and sedation, anxiety and discomfort VAS were similar between groups. Patient satisfaction with PCS was high. In the PCS group, 10 (35%) of the 28 patients did not use the device because they were comfortable and did not feel they needed sedation. Satisfaction was higher in the PCS group (P = 0.02), whether or not they used the PCS device, compared with patients who did not receive a PCS device.
Conclusions: Propofol PCS represents a safe sedation technique among elderly patients in a monitored care setting. Elderly patients appear to prefer the option of receiving some form of intraoperative sedation and respond favourably to the opportunity to control administration.
Similar articles
-
Propofol patient-controlled sedation during hip or knee arthroplasty in elderly patients.Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03014458. Can J Anaesth. 1997. PMID: 9104520 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-controlled sedation vs. anaesthetic nurse-controlled sedation for cataract surgery in elderly patients.Int J Clin Pract. 2008 May;62(5):776-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01544.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7. Int J Clin Pract. 2008. PMID: 18067560 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;99(3):511-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04088.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15056094 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-Controlled Versus Clinician-Controlled Sedation With Propofol: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analyses.Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):873-880. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003361. Anesth Analg. 2018. PMID: 29750696
-
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930231 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-controlled sedation.Anesth Prog. 1998 Summer;45(3):117-26. Anesth Prog. 1998. PMID: 19598717 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources