Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Oct;234(10):628-32.
doi: 10.1007/BF00185296.

Reproducibility of the data determined by scanning laser polarimetry

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reproducibility of the data determined by scanning laser polarimetry

A Junghardt et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Scanning laser polarimetry is a tool for measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer: both its cross-sectional surface (polarimetric data analysis) and its thickness (mean sector values).

Methods: Two observers examined 56 normal volunteers twice by means of scanning laser polarimetry (Nerve Fiber Analyzer type 1, software version 1.6). Measurements of the retinal nerve fiber layer were carried out in four equal sectors of a circle around the optic nerve head. The measured values of the sectors and the calculated ratios among them were used for statistical analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were analyzed following a balanced random three-way cross classification with interactions. Interobserver reproducibility was defined as the part of variance not influenced by the observers. Intraobserver reproducibility was defined as the part of variance not influenced by the time.

Results: For repeated measurements of the retinal nerve fiber layer, better intraobserver than interobserver reproducibility was found (0.57-0.79 vs 0.11-0.44). The interobserver reproducibility was improved (0.24-0.65) in comparison to the intraobserver reproducibility (0.32-0.68) by calculating the ratios of the measured values.

Conclusion: The instrument is clinically useful only if used by the same observer. If measurements are performed by different observers the ratios of the measurements must be used. Further development in the apparatus is needed to improve interobserver reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Jan;109(1):77-83 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 May;100(5):807-14 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 May;113(5):586-96 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Nov;31(11):2373-83 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;98(9):1625-9 - PubMed