Immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine administered in mass campaigns versus routine immunization programmes
- PMID: 8907770
- PMCID: PMC2486680
Immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine administered in mass campaigns versus routine immunization programmes
Abstract
Reported are the results of a study to investigate the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) when administered in mass campaigns compared with that following routine immunization programmes. For this purpose, paired sera were collected from a cohort of children before and after a mass vaccination with OPV in Morocco in 1987. Serum samples and information on vaccination status and other confounding factors that could influence antibody responses to OPV were collected. Neutralizing antibody titres to poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 were determined using a standardized assay. OPV doses administered exclusively during the mass campaign were consistently associated with higher type-specific seroprevalence rates than the same number of doses administered in the routine programme. These findings could not be attributed to differences in confounding factors. Enhanced secondary spread of vaccine virus may have occurred but could not be demonstrated because of limitations in the study design. Mass campaigns appear to be highly effective in raising the dose-related poliovirus type-specific immunity of the population above that achieved by the routine immunization programme. Our findings support the continued use of mass campaigns as an adjunct to routine programmes in order to both enhance and catalyse current efforts to achieve the global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000.
PIP: Reported are the results of a study to investigate the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) when administered in mass campaigns compared with that following routine immunization programs. For this purpose, paired sera were collected from a cohort of children before and after a mass vaccination with OPV in Morocco in 1987. Serum samples and information on vaccination status and other confounding factors that could influence antibody responses to OPV were collected. Neutralizing antibody titers to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were determined using a standardized assay. OPV doses administered exclusively during the mass campaign were consistently associated with higher type-specific seroprevalence rates than the same number of doses administered in the routine program. These findings could not be attributed to differences in confounding factors. Enhanced secondary spread of vaccine virus may have occurred but could not be demonstrated because of limitations in the study design. Mass campaigns appear to be highly effective in raising the dose-related poliovirus type-specific immunity of the population above that achieved by the routine immunization program. These findings support the continued use of mass campaigns as an adjunct to routine programs in order to both enhance and catalyze current efforts to achieve the global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000. (author's)
Similar articles
-
Lessons from Cuba: mass campaign administration of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine and seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies.Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(2):221-5. Bull World Health Organ. 1994. PMID: 8205641 Free PMC article.
-
Oral iodine supplementation does not reduce neutralizing antibody responses to oral poliovirus vaccine.Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(6):484-91. Bull World Health Organ. 1999. PMID: 10427933 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[A comparison of the effectiveness of mass immunization campaign of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (TOPV) by epidemiological serosurvey. Shandong Collaborating Group for Poliomyelitis Control and Surveillance, Jinan, Shandong].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1992 Oct;13(5):261-4. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1992. PMID: 1338626 Chinese.
-
Ensuring preparedness for potential poliomyelitis outbreaks: Recommendations for the US poliovirus vaccine stockpile from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Dec;158(12):1106-12. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.12.1106. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004. PMID: 15583093 Review.
-
Polio eradication: the OPV paradox.Rev Med Virol. 2003 Sep-Oct;13(5):277-91. doi: 10.1002/rmv.401. Rev Med Virol. 2003. PMID: 12931339 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of immunity to polio among Rohingya children in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, 2018: A cross-sectional survey.PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 31;17(3):e1003070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003070. eCollection 2020 Mar. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32231366 Free PMC article.
-
Preeradication vaccine policy options for poliovirus infection and disease control.Risk Anal. 2013 Apr;33(4):516-43. doi: 10.1111/risa.12019. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Risk Anal. 2013. PMID: 23461599 Free PMC article.
-
Community-acquired poliovirus infection in children with primary immunodeficiencies in Tunisia.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Mar;41(3):1203-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1203-1211.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12624052 Free PMC article.
-
Polio elimination in Nigeria: A review.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Mar 3;12(3):658-63. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1088617. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 26383769 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does Simultaneous Administration of Bivalent (Types 1 and 3) Oral Poliovirus Vaccine and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Induce Mucosal Cross-immunity to Poliovirus Type 2?Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 30;67(suppl_1):S51-S56. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy604. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30376088 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical