Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Nov;87(11):807-12.

Sickle cell screening policies as portent: how will the human genome project affect public sector genetic services?

Affiliations

Sickle cell screening policies as portent: how will the human genome project affect public sector genetic services?

D D Phoenix et al. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 Nov.

Abstract

The Human Genome Project holds much promise for providing dramatic improvements in our understanding of and means to diagnose and treat many diseases. As this enormously important endeavor proceeds, research on ethical, legal, and social implications of this new science is being conducted to forecast problems and recommend policy option solutions to avoid what might otherwise become adverse consequences. Sickle cell screening is an example of a technology that was introduced in a manner that raised poignant issues. On the basis of sickle cell issues, we examined policy issues likely to occur as new genetic technologies are incorporated into medical practice. Discussion and development of a national consensus on the appropriate content and just delivery of public sector genetic services is vital; otherwise, the impact of Human Genome Project-derived technology may result in misadventures that amplify problems currently evident in newborn screening programs. New DNA-based diagnostic technologies and therapies will soon enter the stream of commerce. The recommendations offered here, while based on examination of sickle cell disease policies, are intended to address both current inequities as well as potential future issues related to stigmatization and distributive justice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9852-6 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Med Metab Biol. 1994 Jun;52(1):27-35 - PubMed
    1. Eur Neurol. 1994;34(4):181-5 - PubMed
    1. Houst Law Rev. 1992 Spring;29(1):85-148 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1982 Dec;72(12):1347-52 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources