Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?

Affiliations

D F Horrobin. Lancet. 1996.

. 1996 Nov 9;348(9037):1293-5.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08029-4.

No abstract available

Comment in

Luck, lotteries, and loopholes of grant review.
Horton R. Horton R. Lancet. 1996 Nov 9;348(9037):1255-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65751-0. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8909373 No abstract available.
Peer review and grant applications.
Waldron HA. Waldron HA. Lancet. 1997 Jan 4;349(9044):63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62205-2. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8988147 No abstract available.
Peer review and grant applications.
Grewal N. Grewal N. Lancet. 1997 Jan 4;349(9044):63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62206-4. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8988148 No abstract available.
Peer review and grant applications.
Foëx BA. Foëx BA. Lancet. 1997 Jan 4;349(9044):63. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8988149 No abstract available.