Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Nov;112(5):1378-86.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70155-1.

Ischemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: a word of caution

Affiliations
Free article

Ischemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: a word of caution

L P Perrault et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Ischemic preconditioning is now established as an effective means of reducing infarct size. However, it remains uncertain whether preconditioning can improve the myocardial protection afforded by cardioplegia. The present study was designed to address this issue.

Methods: After the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass, 10 patients were preconditioned with 3 minutes of aortic crossclamping followed by 2 minutes of reperfusion before the onset of retrograde continuous warm cardioplegic arrest. Ten case-matched patients served as controls. Three blood samples were drawn simultaneously from the radial artery and the coronary sinus before bypass, at the end of the 5-minute preconditioning protocol or after 5 minutes of bypass in control patients, and at the end of cardioplegic arrest. These samples were assayed for creatine kinase MB isoenzyme and lactate. Right atrial biopsy specimens taken at the same time points were processed by Northern blotting for the expression of messenger ribonucleic acid of both c-fos and heat shock protein 70.

Results: At the end of arrest, the release of creatine kinase MB from the myocardium was markedly greater in preconditioned patients than in the controls. The transmyocardial lactate gradient was shifted toward production in the preconditioned group (+0.22 +/- 0.13 mmol/L) and toward extraction in the control group (-0.06 +/- 0.21 mmol/L). Molecular biology data did not suggest a protective effect of preconditioning. There were no clinical adverse events related to preconditioning.

Conclusions: Preconditioning does not enhance cardioplegic protection and might even be deleterious. These results do not dismiss its use in cardiac operations. They rather emphasize the need for identifying pharmacologic mediators that could safely and effectively duplicate the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types