Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia
- PMID: 8923199
- DOI: 10.2527/1996.74112843x
Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia
Abstract
Although the number of women receiving doctorates and in academic positions has increased over the past 20 yr, females still are under-represented on university faculties. The extent of and reasons for this inequity are discussed. There are four critical periods that influence the retention of women in science: early childhood, adolescence, college, and the graduate school/job entry period. For each of the later three periods, the paper addresses the relationship between self-esteem and job performance, the quality and impacts of classroom interactions, and the role of the advisor/mentor. In addition, some of the difficulties in combining career and family responsibilities are considered. Effective networking and mentoring play an important role at the faculty level. If our goal is to have a scientific community open equally to all members of the general population, it is necessary to keep adolescent girls involved in math and science and to maintain their self-esteem. New faculty need to be more completely included in departmental and professional activities through both formal programs and good neighborliness on the behalf of existing faculty.
Similar articles
-
The role of mentors for women in animal science: perspectives from government.J Anim Sci. 1996 Nov;74(11):2855-9. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112855x. J Anim Sci. 1996. PMID: 8923201 Review.
-
Breaking through the glass ceiling: an industrial perspective.J Anim Sci. 1996 Nov;74(11):2849-54. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112849x. J Anim Sci. 1996. PMID: 8923200 Review.
-
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014. PMID: 26172066
-
Why aren't women sticking with science in Taiwan?Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2010 Jun;26(6 Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(10)70055-3. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2010. PMID: 20538244 Free PMC article.
-
Gender inequity: challenging business as usual.Nat Immunol. 2001 Nov;2(11):985-7. doi: 10.1038/ni1101-985. Nat Immunol. 2001. PMID: 11685216 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33052933 Free PMC article.
-
From presentation to paper: Gender disparities in oncological research.Int J Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;146(11):3011-3021. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32660. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Int J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31472016 Free PMC article.
-
Digit ratio (2D:4D) and academic success as measured by achievement in the academic degree "Habilitation".PLoS One. 2019 Feb 25;14(2):e0212167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212167. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30802262 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ten simple rules for a mom-friendly Academia.PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 10;19(8):e1011284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011284. eCollection 2023 Aug. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023. PMID: 37561706 Free PMC article.
-
Supporting early-career women researchers: lessons from a global mentorship programme.Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2162228. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2162228. Glob Health Action. 2023. PMID: 36705071 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous