Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996;6(5):587-95.
doi: 10.1007/BF00187654.

Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases

Affiliations
Review

Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases

V Söderlund. Eur Radiol. 1996.

Abstract

The clinical management of patients with skeletal metastases puts new demands on imaging. The radiological imaging in screening for skeletal metastases entails detection, metastatic site description and radiologically guided biopsy for morphological typing and diagnosis. Regarding sensitivity and the ease in performing surveys of the whole skeleton, radionuclide bone scintigraphy still is the first choice in routine follow-up of asymptomatic patients with metastatic disease of the skeleton. A negative scan has to be re-evaluated with other findings, with emphasis on the possibility of a false-negative result. Screening for metastases in patients with local symptoms or pain is best accomplished by a combination of radiography and MRI. Water-weighted sequences are superior in sensitivity and in detection of metastases. Standard spin-echo sequences on the other hand are superior in metastatic site description and in detection of intraspinal metastases. MRI is helpful in differentiating between malignant disease, infection, benign vertebral collapse, insufficiency fracture after radiation therapy, degenerative vertebral disease and benign skeletal lesions. About 30% of patients with known cancer have benign causes of radiographic abnormalities. Most of these are related to degenerative diseases and are often easily diagnosed. However, due to overlap in MRI characteristics, bone biopsy sometimes is essential for differentiating between malignant and nonmalignant lesions. Performing bone biopsy and aspiration cytology by radiologist and cytologist in co-operation has proven highly accurate in diagnosing bone lesions. The procedure involves low risk to the patient and provides a morphological diagnosis. Once a suspected metastatic lesion is detected, irrespective of modality, the morphological diagnosis determines the appropriate work-up imaging with respect to the therapy alternatives. The integration of multimodality imaging in the assessment of skeletal metastases is complex and requires multidiciplinary co-operation in order to optimize screening and medical clinical care with respect to the prognosis and life quality of patients with bone metastatic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989 Jul-Aug;13(4):598-602 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Feb;166(2):415-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1989 Jul;60(1):83-8 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 May-Jun;16(3):454-60 - PubMed
    1. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother. 1991;8(4):253-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources