Familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in the general population
- PMID: 8945611
- DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19961115)68:4<428::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-2
Familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in the general population
Abstract
To investigate the familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in Denmark, parents and siblings of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed below age 60 years in the years 1982-1984 were identified through population registries. For 1,470 probands with families eligible for tracing, 1,376 mothers, 1,303 fathers and 3,259 siblings were identified. They contributed 222,634 person-years, and 325 cases of colorectal cancer were observed during the follow-up period 1943-1992. All data were retrieved from population registries and consequently were free from any reporting bias. The overall standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) compared with the Danish population was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-2.25), significantly different between the parents (1.78, 95% CI 1.55-2.04) and the siblings (2.65, 95% CI 2.21-3.17). A strong dependence on the proband's age at diagnosis was seen for the sibling risk; siblings of probands less than 50 years old at diagnosis had a 5-fold risk compared with the general population. This dependence was not seen for parents, but the risk tended to be higher for parents of younger ages. No other factor was seen to influence the relative risk. The observation of an 80% increased risk among the parents and a 170% increased risk among the siblings indicates that the genetic component is one source, but probably not the only one, of familial aggregation of colorectal cancer. The cost benefit of screening siblings of colorectal cancer patients is substantially higher than that for the total population.
Similar articles
-
Familial risks for colorectal cancer show evidence on recessive inheritance.Int J Cancer. 2005 Jul 10;115(5):835-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20938. Int J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15704173
-
Familial colorectal cancer risk in half siblings and siblings: nationwide cohort study.BMJ. 2019 Mar 14;364:l803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l803. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30872356 Free PMC article.
-
Age- and gender-specific familial risks for venous thromboembolism: a nationwide epidemiological study based on hospitalizations in Sweden.Circulation. 2011 Aug 30;124(9):1012-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.965020. Epub 2011 Aug 8. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21824919
-
Familial risk of cancer shortly after diagnosis of the first familial tumor.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Nov 2;97(21):1575-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji338. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 16264177
-
Evaluation of bias in familial risk estimates: a study of common cancers using Swedish population-based registers.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1318-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn290. Epub 2008 Sep 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 18780865
Cited by
-
Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors.Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Jun;24(6):1207-22. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0201-5. Epub 2013 Apr 6. Cancer Causes Control. 2013. PMID: 23563998 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative evaluation and oncologic principles of colon cancer surgery.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 Aug;18(3):163-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916277. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005. PMID: 20011299 Free PMC article.
-
Sibling risks in cancer: clues to recessive or X-linked genes?Br J Cancer. 2001 Feb 2;84(3):388-91. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1585. Br J Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11161404 Free PMC article.
-
Serrated polyposis is an underdiagnosed and unclear syndrome: the surgical pathologist has a role in improving detection.Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Aug;36(8):1178-85. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182597f41. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012. PMID: 22790859 Free PMC article.
-
Serrated pathway colorectal cancer in the population: genetic consideration.Gut. 2007 Oct;56(10):1453-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.126870. Epub 2007 Jun 12. Gut. 2007. PMID: 17566021 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical