Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Oct;11(10):625-34.
doi: 10.1007/BF02599031.

How well can the chest radiograph diagnose left ventricular dysfunction?

Affiliations
Review

How well can the chest radiograph diagnose left ventricular dysfunction?

R G Badgett et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To review the diagnostic utility of the chest radiograph for left ventricular dysfunction.

Data sources: Structured MEDLINE searches, citation reviews of relevant primary research, review articles, and textbooks, personal files, and data from experts.

Study selection: Studies of patients without valvular disease that allowed calculation of the sensitivity and specificity of selected radiographic signs compared with a criterion standard of increased left ventricular preload or reduced ejection fraction.

Data extraction: Two independent readers reviewed 29 studies. Studies were pooled after stratification by radiographic finding, criterion standard, and clinical setting.

Main results: Redistribution best diagnosed increased preload with a sensitivity of 65% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55%, 75%) and specificity 67% (95% CI 53%, 79%). Cardiomegaly best diagnosed decreased ejection fraction with a sensitivity of of 51% (95% CI 43%, 60%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI 71%, 85%). Interrater reliability was fair to moderate for redistribution and moderate for cardiomegaly. The clinical setting affected results by decreasing the specificity of cardiomegaly to 8% in detecting increased preload in patients with severe systolic dysfunction. The absence of redistribution could only exclude increased preload in situations in which the suspicion (pretest probability) of disease was less than 9%, whereas redistribution could confirm increased preload when the pretest probability was greater than 91%. The absence of cardiomegaly could only exclude a reduced ejection fraction if the pretest probability was less than 8%, whereas cardiomegaly could confirm a reduced ejection fraction if the pretest probability was greater than 87%.

Conclusions: Redistribution and cardiomegaly are the best chest radiographic findings for diagnosing increased preload and reduced ejection fraction, respectively. Unfortunately, neither finding alone can adequately exclude or confirm left ventricular dysfunction in usual clinical settings. Redistribution is not always reliably interpreted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • ACP J Club. 1997 May-Jun;126(3):77

References

    1. Clin Cardiol. 1988 Jul;11(7):486-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):385-90 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):968-74 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1980 Nov;44(5):560-9 - PubMed
    1. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources