Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Nov;162(11):905-11.

Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8956961

Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception

W Graf et al. Eur J Surg. 1996 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the functional outcome after suture rectopexy in patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: University hospital, Sweden.

Subjects: 33 patients with rectal prolapse and 19 patients with intussusception treated by abdominal suture rectopexy 1969-1992.

Main outcome measures: Bowel function evaluated by a questionnaire a median of 97 months after operation.

Results: 10/33 patients (30%) reported less constipation after rectopexy in the prolapse group compared with 3/19 (16%) in the intussusception group (p = 0.33). Rectal emptying improved in 14/33 (42%) and 1/19 (5%), respectively (p = 0.005), and incontinence in 12/33 (36%) and 3/19 (16%), respectively (p = 0.20). Seventeen patients (52%) with prolapse and 3 (16%) with intussusception described the result of operation as excellent or good (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: There is a reasonable chance of improved rectal emptying and continence in patients undergoing suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse, whereas bowel symptoms commonly worsen postoperatively in patients treated for intussusception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources