Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Nov;75(5):444-7.
doi: 10.1136/adc.75.5.444.

Primary vesicoureteric reflux--how useful is postnatal ultrasound?

Affiliations

Primary vesicoureteric reflux--how useful is postnatal ultrasound?

J M Tibballs et al. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Nov.

Abstract

The presence or absence of pelvicalyceal dilatation on postnatal ultrasound continues to appear within diagnostic algorithms to select patients for micturating cystourethrography (MCU) in the investigation of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis. Postnatal ultrasound findings were assessed in a population diagnosed as having antenatal hydronephrosis due solely to primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) to see whether this is justified. The postnatal ultrasound and MCU findings in 177 patients with primary VUR detected as antenatal hydronephrosis were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 132 (75%) were boys. Reflux was unilateral in 103 cases and bilateral in 74 (42%). Altogether 37% of boys and 33% of girls with a renal pelvic diameter of < or = 10 mm had grade III-V VUR. Calyceal and/or ureteric dilatation had specificities of 87-96% for grade III-V VUR, but sensitivities of only 37-54%. Fifty eight per cent of male and 75% of female renal units with grade III VUR and 17% of male units with grade IV-V VUR were normal on ultrasound. Approximately 25% of ultrasonically normal renal units had grade III-V VUR on MCU. Postnatal ultrasound criteria correlate poorly with the presence and degree of VUR in children with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis and should not be used to direct the use of cystography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1990 Aug 11;336(8711):372 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1990 Sep;66(3):225-31 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1991 Mar;67(3):267-71 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1991 Dec 21-28;338(8782-8783):1571-3 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1992 Oct;148(4):1229-31 - PubMed