Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Nov 15;21(22):2594-602.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00009.

The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

Affiliations

The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

P Dreyfuss et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: This prospective study evaluated the diagnostic utility of historically accepted sacroiliac joint tests. A multidisciplinary expert panel recommended 12 of the "best" sacroiliac joint tests to be evaluated against a criterion standard of unequivocal gain relief after an intra-articular injection of local anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint.

Objectives: To identify a single sacroiliac joint test or ensemble of test that are sufficiently useful in diagnosing sacroiliac joint disorders to be clinically valuable.

Summary of background data: No previous research has been done to evaluate any physical test of sacroiliac joint pain against an accepted criterion standard.

Methods: Historical data was obtained, and the 12 tests were performed by two examiners on 85 patients who subsequently underwent sacroiliac joint blocks. Ninety percent or more relief was considered a positive response, and less then 90% relief was considered a negative response.

Results: There were 45 positive and 40 negative responses. No historical feature, none of the 12 sacroiliac joint tests, and no ensemble of these 12 tests demonstrated worthwhile diagnostic value.

Conclusion: Sacroiliac joint pain is resistant to identification by the historical and physical examination data from tests evaluated in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in