Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Jan;35(1):165-8.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.165-168.1997.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in a colony of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Affiliations

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in a colony of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

L K Handt et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan.

Abstract

Twenty-three young adult rhesus monkeys from China were evaluated for the presence of Helicobacter pylori. Gastric body and antral biopsy samples were tested for H. pylori by PCR analysis, culture, rapid urease testing, and histologic evaluation. Serologic testing to detect H. pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was performed by using a commercially available human-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test and an ELISA test which utilized homologous H. pylori antigens and an anti-rhesus IgG conjugate. PCR analysis with H. pylori-specific 26-kDa protein primers detected H. pylori in 21 of the 23 rhesus monkeys (91%). Culture testing identified the organism in 12 of the 23 animals (52%). Rapid urease tests were positive for all animals. H. pylori was diagnosed by histological examination in 11 of 23 monkeys (48%). Of the 21 monkeys positive for H. pylori by PCR, only 3 (14%) had positive results by the commercial ELISA test, yielding a sensitivity of 14%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 22%. However, 19 of the 21 PCR-positive animals (90%) had positive results by the ELISA test with homologous rhesus H. pylori antigen and anti-monkey conjugate, with predicted index values greater than or equal to 0.7 considered positive and values between 0.5 and 0.7 considered equivocal. This test had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91%. Therefore, the ELISA test with rhesus monkey origin components was more accurate for detecting infected animals than the human-based ELISA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gut. 1991 Nov;32(11):1291-4 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):54-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1992 Apr 4;339(8797):834-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 May 1;116(9):705-8 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1994 Jun;62(6):2367-74 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms