Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Jan;46(1):63-9.
doi: 10.2337/diab.46.1.63.

Insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in African-Americans, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics with NIDDM: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in African-Americans, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics with NIDDM: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study

S M Haffner et al. Diabetes. 1997 Jan.

Abstract

NIDDM is usually characterized by beta-cell failure and decreased insulin sensitivity. It has been reported that a high proportion of African-American NIDDM subjects are insulin sensitive. To examine this issue, we determined insulin sensitivity (S(I)) in 479 NIDDM subjects by minimal model analyses of frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), a large multicenter study of insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk in African-Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. The African-Americans and non-Hispanic whites were sampled in Los Angeles and Oakland, California. The non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics were sampled in San Antonio, Texas, and San Luis Valley, Colorado. We defined the proportion of insulin-sensitive (S(I)) subjects as > or =1.61 min-1 x microU-1 x ml-1, which is above the median for nondiabetic subjects of all ethnic groups in the IRAS. Using this definition, the proportion of insulin-sensitive diabetic subjects was very low in all ethnic groups (non-Hispanic whites [14.3%] vs. African-Americans [6.5%], P = 0.039 in Los Angeles and Oakland; non-Hispanic whites [6.8%] vs. Hispanics [4.9%], P = 0.737 in San Luis Valley and San Antonio). These results were also similar in newly diagnosed mildly hyperglycemic diabetic subjects. In addition, these results were not affected by the adjustment for differences in obesity, body fat distribution, and severity of hyperglycemia. Even in nonobese subjects (with BMI <30 kg/m2), the proportion of insulin-sensitive subjects (S(I) > or =1.61 min-1 x microU-1 x ml-1) was low (3.6-9.7%). The acute insulin response (AIR) was significantly higher in African-Americans than in non-Hispanic whites; there were no ethnic differences in AIR between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. There were no significant ethnic differences for non-insulin-mediated glucose disposal (S(G)). We conclude that the number of insulin-sensitive NIDDM subjects is low and similar among non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and African-Americans in the U.S.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms