Effects of metabolic rate and ambient vapour pressure on heat strain in protective clothing
- PMID: 8971493
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02376767
Effects of metabolic rate and ambient vapour pressure on heat strain in protective clothing
Abstract
Studies have shown that variations in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.7 to 3.7 kPa have little effect on heat tolerance time at a metabolic rate above 450 W while wearing protective clothing. With lighter exercise, where tolerance times exceed 60 min, variations in vapour pressure have a significant impact on evaporative heat loss and, therefore, heat tolerance. The present study has examined whether these findings extend to conditions with more extreme variations in vapour pressure. Twelve males performed light (L, 350 W) and heavy (H, 500 W) exercise at 40 degrees C in a dry (D, 1.1 kPa) and humid (H, 4.8 kPa) environment while wearing a semi-permeable nuclear, biological and chemical protective clothing ensemble (0.29 m2 x degree C-1.W-1 or 1.88 clo; Woodcock vapour permeability coefficient, im = 0.33). Partitional calorimetry was used to determine the rate of heat storage (S) with evaporative heat loss from the skin (Esk) calculated from changes in dressed mass or the physical properties of the clothing and the vapour pressure gradient between the skin and the environment. Skin vapour pressure was predicted from measurements of water vapour pressure above the skin surface and in the clothing with humidity sensors coupled with thermistors. Final mean skin temperature (Tsk) was higher for the humid trials and averaged 37.4 (0.3) degree C, 38.9 (0.4) degree C, 37.6 (0.5) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Final rectal temperature (Tre) was higher for D with respective values for LD, LH, HD and HH of 39.0 (0.4) degree C, 38.7 (0.4) degree C, 38.8 (0.4) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C. Tolerance time was significantly different among the trials and averaged 120.3 (19.3) min, 54.8 (7.3) min, 63.5 (6.9) min and 36.8 (3.1) min for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Esk was overestimated and, therefore, S was underestimated when the changes in dressed mass were used to determine evaporative heat loss. When skin vapour pressure determined from the humidity sensor data was used to calculate Esk, heat storage was significantly different among the trials and averaged 15.0 (3.0), 13.0 (1.8), 14.2 (2.6) and 12.2 (1.9) kJ.kg-1 for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. It was concluded that while wearing the protective clothing all indices of heat strain, including tolerance time, were significantly affected by the change in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.1 to 4.8 kPa during both light and heavy exercise.
Similar articles
-
Impact of fluid replacement on heat storage while wearing protective clothing.Ergonomics. 2000 Dec;43(12):2020-30. doi: 10.1080/00140130050201454. Ergonomics. 2000. PMID: 11191783 Clinical Trial.
-
Increased Air Velocity Reduces Thermal and Cardiovascular Strain in Young and Older Males during Humid Exertional Heat Stress.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(9):625-34. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1029613. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015. PMID: 25897617
-
Sex-related differences in thermoregulatory responses while wearing protective clothing.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jun;78(1):28-37. doi: 10.1007/s004210050383. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998. PMID: 9660153
-
Clothing evaporative heat resistance--proposal for improved representation in standards and models.Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Jul;43(5):339-46. Ann Occup Hyg. 1999. PMID: 10481633 Review.
-
Biophysical and physiological integration of proper clothing for exercise.Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1987;15:261-95. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1987. PMID: 3297725 Review.
Cited by
-
Peripheral markers of central fatigue in trained and untrained during uncompensable heat stress.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Mar;112(3):1047-57. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2049-2. Epub 2011 Jul 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012. PMID: 21735219 Clinical Trial.
-
HPA and SAS responses to increasing core temperature during uncompensable exertional heat stress in trained and untrained males.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(5):987-97. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1294-0. Epub 2009 Dec 6. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010. PMID: 19967394 Clinical Trial.
-
An Overt Chemical Protective Garment Reduces Thermal Strain Compared with a Covert Garment in Warm-Wet but Not Hot-Dry Environments.Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 9;8:913. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00913. eCollection 2017. Front Physiol. 2017. PMID: 29170644 Free PMC article.
-
Fractional Contribution of Wildland Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment on Physiological Strain.Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1139. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01139. eCollection 2018. Front Physiol. 2018. PMID: 30154736 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Different Personal Protective Clothing on Wildland Firefighters' Physiological Strain.Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 24;8:618. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00618. eCollection 2017. Front Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28894421 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials