Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Winter;5(4):281-91.

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8972451
Review

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release

P C Innis. J South Orthop Assoc. 1996 Winter.

Abstract

Open carpal tunnel release has been the standard treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome for the past three decades. Since its introduction in the late 1980s, endoscopic carpal tunnel release has generated excitement and controversy. Two basic techniques have developed: the single portal and the double portal. Data from many clinical series and cadaver studies are available for review. The endoscopic carpal tunnel release offers several advantages over the standard open technique, including less scar tenderness, earlier return to work and activities of daily living, and earlier return of pinch and grip strength. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release may be safer than many of the new "mini" open techniques. The indications and threshold for surgery are the same in both techniques. The major contraindications are rheumatoid arthritis, mass lesions, and repeat surgery. Many adjunctive procedures done with open carpal tunnel release such as exploration of the motor branch, release of Guyon's canal, epineurotomy or neurolysis, and flexor tenosynovectomy are unnecessary. With proper training and equipment, endoscopic carpal tunnel release can be done safely, with complication rates comparable to those for the open technique and with high patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources