Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function
- PMID: 8976552
- PMCID: PMC2143314
- DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560051206
Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function
Abstract
One of the primary factors determining how proteins interact with other molecules is the size of clefts in the protein's surface. In enzymes, for example, the active site is often characterized by a particularly large and deep cleft, while interactions between the molecules of a protein dimer tend to involve approximately planar surfaces. Here we present an analysis of how cleft volumes in proteins relate to their molecular interactions and functions. Three separate datasets are used, representing enzyme-ligand binding, protein-protein dimerization and antibody-antigen complexes. We find that, in single-chain enzymes, the ligand is bound in the largest cleft in over 83% of the proteins. Usually the largest cleft is considerably larger than the others, suggesting that size is a functional requirement. Thus, in many cases, the likely active sites of an enzyme can be identified using purely geometrical criteria alone. In other cases, where there is no predominantly large cleft, chemical interactions are required for pinpointing the correct location. In antibody-antigen interactions the antibody usually presents a large cleft for antigen binding. In contrast, protein-protein interactions in homodimers are characterized by approximately planar interfaces with several clefts involved. However, the largest cleft in each subunit still tends to be involved.
Similar articles
-
A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.Proteins. 2006 Feb 1;62(2):479-88. doi: 10.1002/prot.20769. Proteins. 2006. PMID: 16304646
-
A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition.Protein Sci. 1994 May;3(5):717-29. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030501. Protein Sci. 1994. PMID: 8061602 Free PMC article.
-
Interactions in native binding sites cause a large change in protein dynamics.J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 21;358(1):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.097. Epub 2006 Feb 14. J Mol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16513135
-
Interactions between immunogenic peptides and MHC proteins.Annu Rev Immunol. 1991;9:527-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.002523. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991. PMID: 1910688 Review.
-
Prediction of protein-protein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces.Phys Biol. 2011 Jun;8(3):035006. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/3/035006. Epub 2011 May 13. Phys Biol. 2011. PMID: 21572173 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of binding pockets in protein structures using a knowledge-based potential derived from local structural similarities.BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Mar 28;13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S4-S17. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012. PMID: 22536963 Free PMC article.
-
Phosphate binding sites identification in protein structures.Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Mar;39(4):1231-42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq987. Epub 2010 Oct 24. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011. PMID: 20974634 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure.PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000585. Epub 2009 Dec 4. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009. PMID: 19997483 Free PMC article.
-
Which Properties Allow Ligands to Open and Bind to the Transient Binding Pocket of Human Aldose Reductase?Biomolecules. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):1837. doi: 10.3390/biom11121837. Biomolecules. 2021. PMID: 34944481 Free PMC article.
-
Electrostatic and functional analysis of the seven-bladed WD beta-propellers.Evol Bioinform Online. 2008 Jun 13;4:203-16. doi: 10.4137/ebo.s743. Evol Bioinform Online. 2008. PMID: 19204818 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases