Simulated difficult intubation. Comparison of the gum elastic bougie and the stylet
- PMID: 8984868
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14961.x
Simulated difficult intubation. Comparison of the gum elastic bougie and the stylet
Abstract
A randomised study was carried out to compare the efficacy of the gum elastic bougie and the stylet in a simulated difficult intubation. A laryngoscopic assessment, as described by Cormack and Lehane, was made in 100 patients. A Grade 3 view was then simulated. In the Bougie First Group (50 patients) two attempts were made to pass a gum elastic bougie and a tracheal tube into the trachea. If these first two attempts were not successful, two further attempts at intubation were allowed with a stylet placed in the tracheal tube. In the Stylet First Group (50 patients) the order was reversed. After two attempts the tube was correctly placed in the trachea in 96% of cases in the Bougie First Group compared to only 66% of cases in the Stylet First Group (p < 0.001). We recommend that a gum elastic bougie should be readily available and that anaesthetists should use it in preference to a stylet whenever a good view of the glottis is not immediately available.
Comment in
-
Comparison of the gum elastic bougie and the stylet.Anaesthesia. 1997 Apr;52(4):386. Anaesthesia. 1997. PMID: 9135201 No abstract available.
-
Gum elastic bougie for difficult double-lumen intubation.Anaesthesia. 1997 Sep;52(9):929. Anaesthesia. 1997. PMID: 9349096 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
