Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients
- PMID: 8998087
- DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70314-7
Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients
Abstract
Study objective: To determine whether emergency patients with acute chest pain and low suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be managed cost-effectively and safely in a dedicated chest pain center (CPC) that incorporates mandatory stress testing.
Methods: We assembled a prospective observational case series of consecutive adult patients transferred from the emergency department to a nine-bed, 23-hour CPC in a 564-bed community hospital from January 13 through May 31, 1994. In our institution, all emergency patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain of unclear origin, suggestive of myocardial ischemia but with a low probability of AMI, are transferred to the CPC for further evaluation. All patients in whom AMI is ruled out undergo individually appropriate cardiac diagnostic testing in accordance with CPC clinical guidelines. Patients with end-stage coronary artery disease transferred to the CPC for a "rule-out" protocol only did not undergo further diagnostic testing. Admitted and discharged patients were followed through chart review and telephone survey, respectively.
Results: Of the 502 patients transferred to the CPC, 477 (95%) completed follow-up at 14 days. Four hundred ten (86%) were discharged home. Those discharged after diagnostic evaluation yielded negative findings had 100% survival and zero diagnosis of AMI at 5-month follow-up. Overall mortality and incidence of AMI on long-term follow-up for all patients transferred to the CPC were .4% and .2%, respectively. Sixty-seven patients (13%) were admitted from the CPC, of whom 44 (66%) had a final diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) or AMI. Twenty-four patients with IHD (55%; 6% of stress-tested group) were identified only on further stress testing. Of these patients, seven underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting during hospitalization. All were discharged home without major morbidity. Four hundred twenty-four patients (84%) underwent stress testing. The cost of mandatory stress testing to identify one patient with IHD after AMI was ruled out was $3,125. An average cost-per-case savings of 62% was achieved for each patient transferred to the CPC who would have been hospitalized before the inception of the CPC.
Conclusion: Mandatory stress testing is a safe, cost-effective, and valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in CPC patients.
Comment in
-
Chest pain units: do they make sense now?Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):168-71. Ann Emerg Med. 1997. PMID: 8998100 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;40(6):584-94. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.129506. Ann Emerg Med. 2002. PMID: 12447334
-
Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;38(3):207-15. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.116594. Ann Emerg Med. 2001. PMID: 11524638
-
Safety and efficiency of a chest pain diagnostic algorithm with selective outpatient stress testing for emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;59(4):256-264.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.016. Epub 2012 Jan 4. Ann Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22221842
-
Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.Ann Emerg Med. 2000 May;35(5):449-61. Ann Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 10783407 Review.
-
Evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.Curr Probl Cardiol. 1997 Apr;22(4):149-236. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2806(97)80007-2. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1997. PMID: 9107535 Review.
Cited by
-
Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Feb;5(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9333-8. Epub 2011 Dec 13. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012. PMID: 22161254 Review.
-
Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE trial.Emerg Med J. 2007 Jul;24(7):462-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.046862. Emerg Med J. 2007. PMID: 17582033 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain center compared with routine care of patients with chest pain.PLoS One. 2015 Jan 26;10(1):e0117287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117287. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25622029 Free PMC article.
-
Management of chest pain: exploring the views and experiences of chiropractors and medical practitioners in a focus group interview.Chiropr Osteopat. 2005 Sep 2;13:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-18. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005. PMID: 16138920 Free PMC article.
-
ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?Emerg Med J. 2002 Sep;19(5):395-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.5.395. Emerg Med J. 2002. PMID: 12204983 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical