Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations
- PMID: 9001874
Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of double gloving with an inner coloured pair of gloves and double gloving with classic gloves, for prompt detection of perforation during a single standard operation.
Design: Prospective, randomised study.
Setting: Teaching hospital, France.
Subjects: 100 Consecutive patients with haematological malignancy or AIDS, who were referred for implantation of a vascular access port.
Interventions: Insertion of a central line with an implantable chamber under local anaesthesia. The use of double gloving with an inner coloured pair or with classic gloves was decided preoperatively by random allocation.
Main outcome measures: Visual detection of one or more perforations on one or more gloves during operation, localisation of the perforation(s), and post-operative evaluation of the water tightness of the gloves.
Results: There were a total of 14 perforations of the outer gloves, 9 were detected during operation in the coloured inner pair group compared with none in the standard gloves group. Postoperative testing showed that there were no undetected perforations in the coloured inner pair group compared with 5 in the standard gloves group.
Conclusions: Double gloving with a coloured inner pair is effective in the peroperative detection of accidental perforations in surgical gloves.
Similar articles
-
Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.Eur J Surg. 2000 Apr;166(4):293-5. doi: 10.1080/110241500750009113. Eur J Surg. 2000. PMID: 10817324 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):354-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00208.x. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004. PMID: 15327447 Clinical Trial.
-
Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):163-7. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9085056 Clinical Trial.
-
[Perforations and porosity of surgical gloves. Frequency, mechanism, risk].Ann Chir. 1996;50(4):352-5. Ann Chir. 1996. PMID: 8758527 Review. French.
-
Double gloving for self-protection in high-risk surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 8;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02760-z. Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40057774 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Recommended practices for prevention of transmissible infections in the perioperative practice setting.AORN J. 2007 Feb;85(2):383-96. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)60049-0. AORN J. 2007. PMID: 17328148 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
-
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 7;2014(3):CD009573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24610769 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing surgical site infections: a review.Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Fall;2(4):212-21. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 20111657 Free PMC article.
-
Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery.Hip Pelvis. 2015 Mar;27(1):17-22. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.1.17. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Hip Pelvis. 2015. PMID: 27536597 Free PMC article.