Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Jan;6(1):162-74.
doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060119.

Conformational analysis of peptides corresponding to all the secondary structure elements of protein L B1 domain: secondary structure propensities are not conserved in proteins with the same fold

Affiliations

Conformational analysis of peptides corresponding to all the secondary structure elements of protein L B1 domain: secondary structure propensities are not conserved in proteins with the same fold

M Ramírez-Alvarado et al. Protein Sci. 1997 Jan.

Abstract

The solution conformation of three peptides corresponding to the two beta-hairpins and the alpha-helix of the protein L B1 domain have been analyzed by circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). In aqueous solution, the three peptides show low populations of native and non-native locally folded structures, but no well-defined hairpin or helix structures are formed. In 30% aqueous trifluoroethanol (TFE), the peptide corresponding to the alpha-helix adopts a high populated helical conformation three residues longer than in the protein. The hairpin peptides aggregate in TFE, and no significant conformational change occurs in the NMR observable fraction of molecules. These results indicate that the helical peptide has a significant intrinsic tendency to adopt its native structure and that the hairpin sequences seem to be selected as non-helical. This suggests that these sequences favor the structure finally attained in the protein, but the contribution of the local interactions alone is not enough to drive the formation of a detectable population of native secondary structures. This pattern of secondary structure tendencies is different to those observed in two structurally related proteins: ubiquitin and the protein G B1 domain. The only common feature is a certain propensity of the helical segments to form the native structure. These results indicate that for a protein to fold, there is no need for large native-like secondary structure propensities, although a minimum tendency to avoid non-native structures and to favor native ones could be required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Biol. 1993 Nov 20;234(2):483-92 - PubMed
    1. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Nov;2(11):999-1006 - PubMed
    1. Fold Des. 1996;1(2):133-44 - PubMed
    1. Protein Eng. 1996 Jul;9(7):559-65 - PubMed
    1. Biopolymers. 1991 Apr;31(5):497-509 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances