Clinical applications of commonly used contemporary antidotes. A US perspective
- PMID: 9010641
- DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199716010-00002
Clinical applications of commonly used contemporary antidotes. A US perspective
Abstract
Poisonings are a common problem. In 1995, over 2 million exposures were reported to American poison information centres alone. The majority of poisoning exposures can be treated without major therapeutic intervention. If therapy is indicated, it is usually in the form of gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal, to prevent absorption of the toxin and the subsequent toxicity that may occur. In a limited number of cases, more aggressive life-support measures may be necessary to treat the adverse effects of poisons. Occasionally, that intervention may include the use of pharmacological antagonists, more commonly referred to as antidotes. According to the American Association of Poison Control Centers, the most commonly used antidotes are acetylcysteine, naloxone, atropine, deferoxamine (desferrioxamine) and antivenins. Overall, 17 antidotes account for 99% of all antidote use and those agents are reviewed in this article. With the exception of naloxone, most antidotes have pharmacological effects that are independent of their inherent antidotal properties. Therefore, antidotes should be used judiciously because their pharmacological properties may exacerbate pre-existing toxicity and only in rare circumstances are they used prophylactically. Some antidotes, such as digoxin-specific antigen binding fragments (digoxin immune Fab), are very expensive, and both the risk: benefit ratio and the associated cost should be considered before the antidote is administered. The principle aims are to "treat the patient, not the poison' and to do no harm to the patient. Antidotes should be used only when they are indicated and may help a patient.
Similar articles
-
Use of antidotes in cases of poisoning from drugs of abuse treated in Spanish emergency departments.Emergencias. 2025 Apr;37(2):87-94. doi: 10.55633/s3me/008.2025. Emergencias. 2025. PMID: 40320949 English, Spanish.
-
Antidote use in the critically ill poisoned patient.J Intensive Care Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):255-77. doi: 10.1177/0885066606290386. J Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16946442 Review.
-
Antidotes: benefits and risks.Toxicol Lett. 1995 Dec;82-83:779-83. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03519-2. Toxicol Lett. 1995. PMID: 8597142 Review.
-
The anecdotal antidotes.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984 Feb;2(1):145-58. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984. PMID: 6240396 Review.
-
Clinical and institutional aspects of antidote therapy in Russia.Przegl Lek. 2001;58(4):290-2. Przegl Lek. 2001. PMID: 11450355
Cited by
-
Behavioral sequelae following acute diisopropylfluorophosphate intoxication in rats: comparative effects of atropine and cannabinomimetics.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2009.12.006. Epub 2009 Dec 23. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010. PMID: 20034559 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the clinical efficacy and potential adverse effects of a humanized anticocaine monoclonal antibody.Immunotherapy. 2012 Mar;4(3):335-43. doi: 10.2217/imt.12.19. Immunotherapy. 2012. PMID: 22401638 Free PMC article.
-
Fab antibody fragments: some applications in clinical toxicology.Drug Saf. 2004;27(14):1115-33. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427140-00004. Drug Saf. 2004. PMID: 15554746 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical