Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Jan;14(1):15-20.
doi: 10.1007/BF02765745.

An open multicenter study to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal insemination and intrauterine insemination following multiple follicular development as treatment for unexplained infertility

S Ajossa  1 , G B Melis, A Cianci, M E Coccia, A M Fulghesu, G Giuffrida, S Guerriero, A Lanzone, G Francoscarselli
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

An open multicenter study to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal insemination and intrauterine insemination following multiple follicular development as treatment for unexplained infertility

S Ajossa et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: This multicenter study was carried out to compare the efficacy of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and intraperitoneal insemination (IPI) associated with multiple follicular development as treatment for unexplained infertility.

Method: A total of 205 couples completed the trial. Sixty-seven couples underwent treatment with IPI (group A) and 138 couples underwent treatment with IUI (group B).

Results: Clinical pregnancy was obtained in 23 couples in group A (pregnancy rate: 34.3%) and in 36 couples in group B (pregnancy rate: 26.1%). No significant difference was observed between group A and group B. As for the evolution of pregnancies and the incidence of twin pregnancies, no significant difference was observed between the two groups.

Conclusions: Because IUI and IPI allow us to obtain same results and IPI is more invasive than IUI, the latter technique can be considered the method of choice and IPI should be used when IUI is difficult to perform, as in the presence of a tight cervical canal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melis GB, Paoletti AM, Strigini F, Menchini-Fabris F, Canale D, Fioretti P. Pharmacologic induction of multiple follicular development improves the success rate of artificial insemination with husband’s semen in couples with male-related or unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:441–445. - PubMed
    1. Allen NC, Herbert CM, Maxon WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Colston-Wents A. Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:569–573. - PubMed
    1. Forrler A, Dellenbach P, Nisand I, Moreau L, Cranz C, Clavert A, Rumpler Y. Direct intraperitoneal insemination in unexplained and cervical infertility. Lancet. 1986;1:916–917. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91021-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cimino C, Guastella G, Camporetto G, Gullo D, Perino A, Benigno MA, Barba G, Cittadini E. Direct intraperitoneal insemination (DIPI) for the treatment of refractory infertility unrelated to female organic pelvic disease. Acta Eur Fertil. 1988;19:61–65. - PubMed
    1. Hovatta O, Kurumaki H, Tiitien A, Lahteenmaki P, Koskimies AI. Direct intraperitoneal or intrauterine insemination and superovulation in infertility treatment: A randomized study. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:339–339. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances