Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Dec;72(854):739-43.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.854.739.

Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofibrate and sustained-release bezafibrate in patients with type II hyperlipidaemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofibrate and sustained-release bezafibrate in patients with type II hyperlipidaemia

D J Betteridge et al. Postgrad Med J. 1996 Dec.

Abstract

The hypolipidaemic efficacy and safety of ciprofibrate were compared with a sustained-release formulation of bezafibrate (Bezalip Mono) in 174 patients with type II hyperlipidaemia. This multicenter, open, parallel-group study was conducted in general practice. A total of 83 patients received 100 mg ciprofibrate once daily and 91 received 400 mg bezafibrate once daily for eight weeks. Concentrations of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured at baseline (after stabilisation on a lipid-lowering diet) and after eight weeks. Safety was assessed from reports of adverse events and by measuring haematological and biochemical parameters. After eight weeks, ciprofibrate produced a significantly greater decrease in total cholesterol (-17.8% vs -12.5%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-22.4% vs -17.2%), and triglycerides (-33.9% vs -26.1%). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were increased significantly by both drugs (19.6% with ciprofibrate, 24.9% with bezafibrate) but the differences between drugs were non-significant. Both drugs were well tolerated, with headache the most widely reported adverse event.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jul 18;283(6285):179-86 - PubMed
    1. Clin Chem. 1982 Jun;28(6):1379-88 - PubMed
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1982 Aug;44(2):211-21 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1986 Nov 28;256(20):2835-8 - PubMed