Quotation accuracy in neuroanesthesiologic research

Abstract

A considerable number of quotational inaccuracies have been detected in medical and surgical publications in the past. Our study investigated the quotational accuracy of selected references of 32 scientific publications in six anesthesia journals referring to a single article published in a 1973 issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. In four (12.5%) articles, the quotation was in contradiction to the primary author's statement; in 15 (46.9%) articles, it was selective; and in 13 (40.6%) publications, it was in complete agreement with the important statements made in the original article. These results suggest that quotational inaccuracy is also evident in neuroanesthesiologic research. This problem deserves increased attention by authors as well as by reviewers and journal editors.