Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Jul-Sep;81(3):309-15.

Clinical and histologic determinations of adequate breast resection in breast-conserving surgery. A review

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9028998
Review

Clinical and histologic determinations of adequate breast resection in breast-conserving surgery. A review

M Noguchi et al. Int Surg. 1996 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Patient selection is an important consideration in breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and is dependent on the clinical and histologic determination of disease extent. In order to provide adequate local control without compromising cosmetic outcome, the amount of breast tissue that must be excised in BCT needs to be individualized. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging can provide better information than mammography or ultrasonography for assessing multifocal and multicentric disease in the breast. However, they will play a limited role in breast cancer staging until NMR imaging-directed sterotaxic biopsy becomes available. On the other hand, the histologic status of the surgical margins as well as certain features of the tumor including the presence of intraductal components is predictive of the extent of breast cancer. It is reasonable to evaluate and obtain clear margins when performing BCT. However, further investigation of new preoperative imaging and intraoperative staging modalities for assessing multifocal and multicentric disease is necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources