Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Feb;155(2):473-8.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032181.

Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure

Affiliations

Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure

G Chatte et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize changes in oxygenation, expressed as PaO2/F(I)O2, when patients with severe acute respiratory failure (PaO2/F(I)O2 < 150), unrelated to left ventricular failure to atelectasis, were turned to and from a supine to prone position at 1- and 4-h intervals. Ventilator settings were unchanged. Thirty-two consecutive patients were studied 1 h before, 1 and 4 h during and 1 h after placing in a prone position with PaO2/F(I)O2 of 103 +/- 28, 158 +/- 62, 159 +/- 59, and 128 +/- 52, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.001). After 1 h in a prone position, improvement of PaO2/F(I)O2 by 20 mm Hg or more was considered a positive response. Seven patients studied had no response (22%), hereafter referred to as nonresponders, and 25 had a positive response (78%), hereafter referred to as responders. Among the seven nonresponders, two did not tolerate the prone position and were returned supine before the end of the 4-h trial. With the remaining five, PaO2/F(I)O2 evolution was 83 +/- 29, 77 +/- 19, 83 +/- 33, and 81 +/- 47, respectively. For two of the 25 responders, measurements are missing after returning to the supine position. In 10 of the 23 responders (43%) who completed the 4 h prone trial, the PaO2/F(I)O2 returned to its starting value when patients were repositioned supine: 117 +/- 24, 164 +/- 44, 156 +/- 55, and 110 +/- 34, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.01). In 13 of the 23 (57%) improvement persisted: 105 +/- 27, 187 +/- 58, 189 +/- 49, and 157 +/- 49, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Repeated improvements after turning to a prone position were frequently observed. Side effects in the 32 patients after a total of 294 periods in a prone position included minor skin injury and edema, two instances of apical atelectasis, one catheter removal, one catheter compression, one extubation, and one transient supraventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer